Checked against public sources on July 25, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
Research links are available for creatine monohydrate. Use the linked research to check whether the ingredient and outcome you care about are actually connected. Ingredient evidence does not verify this product.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Moist, acidic formats can reduce the active ingredient over time, so the delivered amount may be lower than the label says.
Creatine is stable as dry powder, while published stability research shows faster degradation as moisture and temperature rise. A gummy's delivered amount therefore depends on formulation and shelf-life testing; this record does not test this product.
Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingGradual growth is more ordinary. A sudden burst deserves a closer look.
Written reviews grew from 25 to 66 across 2026-02-20 – 2026-07-20 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~13).
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Filed address
Suite 1100, Cabot Place, 100 New Gower Street, St. John's, NL, A1C6K3, CANADA
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
The label amount is shown beside the ranges used in the linked ingredient studies.
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 5 g of creatine monohydrate per serving. Studies we found used 3 g–5 g a day, so this sits inside that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
$0.50 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 25, 2026
View on Amazon ↗Search results remain not linked to this exact product until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search iHerb ↗Search results remain not linked to this exact product until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search Target ↗Search results remain not linked to this exact product until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built July 25, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.