FDA recall appears in this brand's history
An exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.
Exact product checked · GTIN 672975607159Dr. Berg Nutritionals · observed 2026-07-23
The useful read · Dr. Berg Nutritionals
Dr. Berg All-in-One Vitamins for Hair
FDA recall appears in this brand's history
Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
90capsules · 45 servings
Ingredient amounts are hidden inside a blend
A blend total may be legal, but it prevents you from knowing whether any individual ingredient reaches a meaningful amount.
Research links are available for zinc.
Use the linked research to check whether the ingredient and outcome you care about are actually connected. Ingredient evidence does not verify this product.
Shopper scorecard
The useful findings, in decision order.
Only product facts and comparisons earn a card. Pipeline gaps stay collapsed.
Is the label honest?
Any trouble on the record?
Needs explanationFDA public records
FDA recall appears in this brand's history
Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. Health & Wellness Center, Inc. recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2021-09-24: “Product recalled because of the presence of mold and/or yeast found in amounts that exceed the product's established specif…
Why it mattersAn exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.
Open the source-linked findingWill it do what you want?
Public contextNIH / published research
Research links are available for zinc.
Published sources describe how zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.
Why it mattersUse the linked research to check whether the ingredient and outcome you care about are actually connected. Ingredient evidence does not verify this product.
Open the source-linked findingWhat remains open 1
- Not yet in NIH's public label registry.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Relevant research · quick links
Read the ingredient evidence directly
These links provide the public research context used alongside the captured panel. They do not establish safety, effectiveness, or product quality.
Want the complete evidence trail?
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check
Confirmed evidence
What checked out00
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Nothing could be independently confirmed from the available record.
Documented concerns
What needs caution01
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing07
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.
FDA recall appears in this brand's history
Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. Health & Wellness Center, Inc. recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2021-09-24: “Product recalled because of the presence of mold and/or yeast found in amounts that exceed the product's established specifications .” (status: Terminated). The recalled product was: “Dr. Berg Nutritionals, Liquid Vitamin D with Zinc Dietary Supplement ( Liquid Vitamin D ), Individual 1 FL OZ bottle (with no secondary packaging), Glass bottle. The label of t” — not necessarily the product on this page. Verify at FDA’s recall database.
No label filed with NIH's public catalog
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 307 on 2026-01-25 to 339 on 2026-07-12 (net +32). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Barcode record is too sparse to confirm identity
Open Food Facts resolves 672975607159 to "Hair Formula" (brand not supplied), but that record lacks enough exact brand/product detail to confirm or contradict this listing.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Answered by the panel: the 0.000667 g listing number equals Riboflavin (vitamin B2) 0.7 mg + Folate (as 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-calcium) 0.266 mg. What lot-specific document confirms those declared amounts?
The panel resolves what the headline number includes. The remaining question is whether the product in hand matches those declared amounts; ask for a lot-specific certificate of analysis.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
3
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 672975607159.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.