The label shows a visible consistency problem
The label visibly shows: “Bacillus Subtilis, Hu58 appears more than once”. This is a specific printing or product-image inconsistency worth checking on the package.
Full record · 674306523282 · back to the summary
Microbiome Labs HU58 Bacillus Subtilis Probiotics for Women and Men
Exact product checkedGTIN 00674306523282 · checked 2026-07-29
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
2listed rows
2separately quantified
0combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 2 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bacillus subtilis, HU58 | 100 mg | — | |
| Bacillus subtilis, HU58 | 10 Billion CFU | — |
Integrity tells · quoted observations
“Bacillus Subtilis, Hu58 appears more than once”
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out0
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Nothing could be independently confirmed from the available record.
Documented concerns
What needs caution1
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Caution
Unresolved public record
What is still missing7
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math
The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, per-serving dose, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.
Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: Novozymes A/S (aktieselskab (a/s); DENMARK), Physicians Exclusive LLC, NOVOZYMES A/S. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 56 on 2026-01-15 to 84 on 2026-06-23 (net +28). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
UPC valid, no independent record
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 674306523282.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Benefit claim “Microbiome Labs HU58 Bacillus Subtilis Probiotics for Women and Men - High Potency Spore Probiotic for Digestive Health & Immune Support - Daily Capsules with 10 Billion ” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 674306523282 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Microbiome Labs |
| Source listing identifier | B087N2NPM9 |
| Retailer listing title | Microbiome Labs HU58 Bacillus Subtilis Probiotics for Women and Men - … show full titleMicrobiome Labs HU58 Bacillus Subtilis Probiotics for Women and Men - High Potency Spore Probiotic for Digestive Health & Immune Support - Daily Capsules with 10 Billion CFU (60 Capsules) |
| USPTO brand-owner record | Novozymes A/S (aktieselskab (a/s); DENMARK) · DENMARK · registration 8233207 · DENMARK); Krogshøjvej 36, Bagsværd, 2880, DENMARK |
| USPTO brand-owner record | Physicians Exclusive LLC · WYOMING, USA; DENMARK · registration 5917017 · SUITE 210, 101 E. TOWN PLACE, ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA 32092, UNITED STATES |
| USPTO brand-owner record | NOVOZYMES A/S · DENMARK · registration not stated · KROGSHOEJVEJ 36, BAGSVAERD, DK-2880, DENMARK |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving Size 2 Capsules |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Pack statement | 60 Capsules |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Bacillus subtilis, HU58 | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Bacillus subtilis, HU58 | 10 Billion CFU | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“SPORE-BASED PROBIOTIC” · “GASTROINTESTINAL HEALTH” · “Ultra Strength” · “Bacillus Subtilis” · “Dietary Supplement” · “Ultra Strength Spore-Based Probiotic” · “Concentrated Bacillus subtilis HU58™” · “Survives the digestive process”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $50.32 checked Aug 02, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Official brand domain: microbiomelabs.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Record 674306523282 · built August 02, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai