lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 689349716065 · back to the summary

Dragon Herbs Tonic Alchemy Superfood Greens Powder with 91 Ingredients: Tonic Herbs

2 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built August 06, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00689349716065 · checked 2026-08-06

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

25listed rows
24separately quantified
1combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes 24 separately ingredients with amounts and 1 combined blend total. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories30
Total Carbohydrate5 g
Dietary Fiber2 g
Total Sugars1 g
Protein2 g
Calcium40 mg
Iron1.8 mg
Vitamin A900 mcg
Vitamin C48 mg
Vitamin E1.6 mg
Vitamin K72 mcg
Niacin0.8 mg
Folate116 mcg
Vitamin B124.2 mcg
Phosphorus20 mg
Iodine105 mcg
Magnesium8 mg
Potassium125 mg
Proprietary Blend9 g
Grass Juices2140 mg
Green Superfoods1495 mg
Whole Grasses1475 mg
Supertonic Herbs (Pure Yield Extracts)1111 mg
Antioxidant Superfruits732 mg
Fibrous Superfoods504 mg

vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out0

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Nothing could be independently confirmed from the available record.

Documented concerns

What needs caution1

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

Ingredient amounts are hidden inside “Proprietary Blend”

The panel lists “Proprietary Blend” (9 g) as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing9

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Panel arithmetic needs confirmation

The listing-image panel produced 16,703 mg across 20 actives for an ≈9,000 mg serving. That cannot be reconciled; the physical label or another exact filed document must settle it.

No data

Photo-read pack math is internally consistent

30 servings × 9 g = 270 g, matching the printed net weight 270 g (Net Wt. 9.5 oz. (270 g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how magnesium, prebiotic fiber, multivitamin / greens blend have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 95 on 2025-07-10 to 116 on 2026-07-31 (net +21). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

Brand ownership record not saved

This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

2

What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?

A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 689349716065.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Benefit claim
“…Tonic Alchemy nourishes the whole body by supporting physical energy and stamina, mental focus, relaxation, gut health, immune support, detoxification, and more.…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Magnesium
shaded = doses used in studies (200 mg–420 mg) · bar = this label
8 mg — below the studied range
Dietary Fiber
shaded = doses used in studies (3 g–10 g) · bar = this label
2 g — below the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID689349716065 — via source listing UPC
BrandDragon Herbs
Source listing identifierB08JN6KY7Q
Retailer listing titleDragon Herbs Tonic Alchemy Superfood Greens Powder with 91 Ingredients…
show full title Dragon Herbs Tonic Alchemy Superfood Greens Powder with 91 Ingredients: Tonic Herbs, Ashwagandha, Mushrooms, Probiotics, Super Greens, Seaweeds, Fruits, Vegetables, Spirulina - 30 Servings

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 scoop (provided, 9 g)
Servings per container30
Net weightNet Wt. 9.5 oz. (270 g)
Badges printed on packNON-GMO, GLUTEN FREE, VEGAN, DAIRY FREE, SOY FREE

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories30 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate5 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Dietary Fiber2 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total Sugars1 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Protein2 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Calcium40 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Iron1.8 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin A900 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin C48 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin E1.6 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin K72 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Niacin0.8 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Folate116 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin B124.2 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Phosphorus20 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Iodine105 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Magnesium8 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Potassium125 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Proprietary Blend9 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Grass Juices2140 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Green Superfoods1495 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Whole Grasses1475 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Supertonic Herbs (Pure Yield Extracts)1111 mgMedium
elemental amount stated on label
Antioxidant Superfruits732 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Fibrous Superfoods504 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“91 in 1” · “Tonic Herbs” · “Probiotics” · “Greens” · “Vegetables” · “Seaweeds” · “Supercharged with Tonic Herbs” · “All Natural Ingredients”

Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$59.95 checked Aug 06, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Official brand domain: dragonherbs.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

CalciumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))

IronNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (28,479) · UL 45 mg (adults, from all sources)

Vitamin ANIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (10,699) · UL 3000 mcg (preformed vitamin A (retinol); excludes beta-carotene)

Vitamin CNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)

Vitamin ENIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (12,326) · UL 1000 mg (supplemental alpha-tocopherol, adults)

Vitamin KNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,124) · no UL established; interacts with warfarin

NiacinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)

FolateNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (10,628) · UL 1000 mcg (synthetic folic acid from supplements/fortified food)

Vitamin B12NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established

PhosphorusNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (13,233) · UL 4000 mg (adults 19-70)

IodineNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (6,462) · UL 1100 mcg (adults)

MagnesiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,814) · UL 350 mg (SUPPLEMENTAL magnesium only (not from food))

PotassiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

magnesiumNIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet · PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation · WebMD: magnesium · ClinicalTrials.gov — 3,206 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold.

prebiotic fiber (inulin-type)NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.

multivitamin / greens blendNIH ODS — Multivitamin/mineral supplements fact sheet · PubMed search: multivitamin supplementation outcomes · ClinicalTrials.gov — 497 registered studies

Use pattern in research: research evaluates multivitamins ingredient-by-ingredient — blend-level health claims outrun what blend-level evidence can show.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 689349716065 · built August 06, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai