lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 707337137590 · back to the summary

Zerospike No Sugar Electrolytes Powder Packets | Keto & Fasting Salts Drink Mix | Supple…

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built August 05, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00707337137590 · checked 2026-08-05

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The 80 mg magnesium claim matches the panel

MARKETING80 mg — per-serving claim
PANELMagnesium 80 mg — same amountPotassium 300 mg
matches panel

We did the comparison: the listing claims 80 mg of magnesium, and the listing-image panel shows 80 mg magnesium 1 stick pack (6.1g). Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories0
Total Fat0 g
Saturated Fat0 g
Trans Fat0 g
Cholesterol0 mg
Sodium1000 mg
Total Carbohydrate0 g
Dietary Fiber0 g
Total Sugars0 g
Includes Added Sugars0 g
Protein0 g
Vitamin D0 mcg
Calcium0 mg
Iron0 mg
Potassium300 mg
Magnesium80 mg

vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out3

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

The dose claim fits the serving — physically possible

Claimed magnesium 80.0 mg is 1% of the ≈6,100 mg serving (serving size printed on the packaging (photo-read from listing images)) — within physical limits.

Confirmed

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

The review count moved gradually, not in one burst

Written reviews rose from 2 to 17 between December 12, 2025 and August 1, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 3, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing11

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Photo-read pack numbers need confirmation

Our image read produced 30 × 6.1 g = 183 g versus net weight 6.1 g. OCR or variant mixing can cause this; check the physical package before treating it as a contradiction.

No data

Listing claim matches the label panel

The listing claims 80 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Magnesium at 80 mg per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.

No data

Magnesium amount, in daily-intake context

label states 80 mg/serving — about 19% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 310–420 mg elemental; NIH sets 350 mg/day as the supplemental upper level for elemental magnesium). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate labels (glycinate, citrate) often state compound mass, which reads ~5–7× higher than elemental magnesium — the Supplement Facts panel settles which is meant. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

Cost to reach a studied dose

At 2.5 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (200–420 mg), this product runs roughly $49 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how magnesium, prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 1 on 2025-08-12 to 17 on 2026-08-01 (net +16). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

Brand ownership record not saved

This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 707337137590.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Manufacturing claim
“…GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE…”
Partly supported
We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Benefit claim
“…💪 SUPPORT YOUR MUSCLES: Stay within your dietary limits while smashing sets at the gym.…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Ingredient evidence exists; on dose: label states 80 mg/serving — about 19% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 310–420 mg elemental; NIH sets 350 mg/day as the supplemental upper level for elemental magnesium). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate labels (glycinate, citrate) often state compound mass, which reads ~5–7× higher than elemental magnesium — the Supplement Facts panel settles which is meant.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Magnesium
shaded = doses used in studies (200 mg–420 mg) · bar = this label
80 mg — below the studied range
prebiotic fiber (inulin-type)Studies typically use 3 g–10 g. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible.

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Label math — claimed dose vs. serving mass
Why is this shown?
Simple physics: the claimed dose has to weigh less than the whole serving. We compare the milligrams promised on the label to the weight of one serving, from the label itself. If the claim fits — even at a small percentage, which is normal, since servings include binders and flavoring — the label is at least physically possible. Only a lab test can confirm what’s actually inside.
claimed magnesium 80 mg1% of serving mass — tiny doses are normal for potent activesserving ≈ 6,100 mg

The claimed magnesium dose of 80 mg fits within the ≈6,100 mg serving — physically possible. Only a lab test can confirm what’s actually inside.

A low percentage isn’t a red flag — most servings are mostly carrier, binder, and flavoring.

Show the arithmetic
magnesium: 80 mg claimed ÷ 6,100 mg serving mass = 1%. Serving mass source: serving size on the label, keyed to UPC 810128521123. Redo it yourself — that’s the point.

Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals

✓ Per-serving dose established✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID707337137590 — via source listing UPC
BrandZerospike
Source listing identifierB0DPQT1P68
Retailer listing titleZerospike No Sugar Electrolytes Powder Packets | Keto & Fasting Salts …
show full title Zerospike No Sugar Electrolytes Powder Packets | Keto & Fasting Salts Drink Mix | Supplements: The Key Hydration Nutrients Missing from Purified Water | Clean, Watermelon, Calorie Free | 30 Sticks

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 stick pack (6.1g)
Servings per container30
Net weightNET WT 0.22 OZ (6.1G)
Pack statement30 STICK PACKS
Badges printed on packMADE IN A FDA REGISTERED FACILITY, ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED COMPANY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE, GMP, NO CARBS, NO HIDDEN INGREDIENTS, NO GLUTEN, FASTING FRIENDLY

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories0 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Fat0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Saturated Fat0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Trans Fat0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Cholesterol0 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium1000 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Dietary Fiber0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total Sugars0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Includes Added Sugars0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Protein0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin D0 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Calcium0 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Iron0 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Potassium300 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Magnesium80 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“Advanced Hydration” · “WATERMELON SALT” · “1000 mg Sodium” · “300 mg Potassium” · “80 mg Magnesium” · “NO SUGAR - NO CARBS” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “Sugar-Free Electrolyte Drink Mix”

Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$19.77 checked Aug 05, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin DNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)

CalciumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))

IronNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (28,479) · UL 45 mg (adults, from all sources)

PotassiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC

MagnesiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,814) · UL 350 mg (SUPPLEMENTAL magnesium only (not from food))

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

magnesiumNIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet · PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation · WebMD: magnesium · ClinicalTrials.gov — 3,206 registered studies

Dosage: label states 80 mg/serving — about 19% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 310–420 mg elemental; NIH sets 350 mg/day as the supplemental upper level for elemental magnesium). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate labels (glycinate, citrate) often state compound mass, which reads ~5–7× higher than elemental magnesium — the Supplement Facts panel settles which is meant.

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold.

prebiotic fiber (inulin-type)NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 707337137590 · built August 05, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai