lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 717504184050 · back to the summary

Magnesium Glycinate Gummies 2 Bottles, Sugar-Free for Adults & Kids

4 concrete dimensions confirmed · 1 still open · built August 02, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00717504184050 · checked 2026-08-02

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The 500 mg magnesium (as magnesium glycinate) claim matches the panel

MARKETING500 mg — per-serving claim
PANELMagnesium (as magnesium glycinate) 500 mg — same amountMagnesium (as magnesium glycinate) 500 mg
matches panel

We did the comparison: the listing claims 500 mg of magnesium (as magnesium glycinate), and the listing-image panel shows 500 mg magnesium (as magnesium glycinate) serving size: 2 gummies. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories15
Total Carbohydrate3 g
Total sugars0 g
Magnesium (as magnesium glycinate)500 mg
Mass check · assumptions shown
3.5 g listed contents = 0.5 g major actives + 3 g carbohydrate
Assume 4 pectin gummies × 2.5–3.5 g each = 10–14 g serving. That leaves roughly 0–2 g for water, pectin, sweetener, acid, and flavor. Serving weight is not printed, so this is a warning, not a closed impossibility.

vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out3

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Shenzhen Jipasimai Technology Co., Ltd. (limited company (ltd.); China) (OTHER) in China for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

The review count moved gradually, not in one burst

Written reviews rose from 3 to 6 between July 8, 2025 and May 15, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 1, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution1

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

The label says 3.5 g of magnesium in 4 gummies — but not what th

A serving is 4 gummies, and the panel lists 3,500 mg — 3.5 g — of magnesium in that serving. What the panel doesn’t give is the one number needed to check it: what a serving weighs. Gummies of this type usually run somewhere around 2.5 to 3.5 grams each, which would put 4 of them near 10 to 14 grams. If that holds here, magnesium would be a high share of the serving’s weight, and that is why we stopped on this number. But we did not weigh these gummies. The 2.5–3.5 gram figure is a general estimate for the format, not a measurement of this product. One published number would settle it: the weight of one gummy, or of a 4-gummy serving. Until then we can’t confirm the 3.5 g and we can’t dispute it. Nothing here says the product is short — only that the label doesn’t let anyone check. Checked August 2, 2026.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing12

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Label math withheld — variant ambiguity

Multi-pack listing (pack of 2) — the stated weight may cover all packs, so per-serving mass can't be pinned. Arithmetic runs only when every number provably belongs to the same product size.

No data

“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named

The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.

No data

Listing claim matches the label panel

The listing claims 500 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Magnesium (as magnesium glycinate) at 500 mg per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.

No data

Magnesium amount, in daily-intake context

label states 500 mg/serving — about 119% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 310–420 mg elemental; NIH sets 350 mg/day as the supplemental upper level for elemental magnesium). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate labels (glycinate, citrate) often state compound mass, which reads ~5–7× higher than elemental magnesium — the Supplement Facts panel settles which is meant. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

Cost to reach a studied dose

At 1.0 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (200–420 mg), this product runs roughly $36 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how magnesium have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 3 on 2025-07-08 to 6 on 2026-05-15 (net +3). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

Package and trademark records name different responsible entitie

The package says manufactured for: Tewuky LLC, 777 N Oceanbluff Ave, San Dimas, CA 91773. USPTO names Shenzhen Jipasimai Technology Co., Ltd. (limited company (ltd.); China) as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the saved records do not establish the relationship.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Answered by the panel: 0.5 g of the 0.5 g headline is magnesium. Which independent lab can confirm that amount in this product?

The panel resolves the front-label arithmetic. The remaining question is lot-specific contents and stability; published category testing gives context, not a test of this product.

2

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

3

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 717504184050.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…Each batch is GMP compliant and lab-tested to ensure quality and safety.…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Manufacturing claim
“…Each batch is GMP compliant and lab-tested to ensure quality and safety.…”
Partly supported
We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Benefit claim
“Magnesium Glycinate Gummies 2 Bottles, Sugar-Free for Adults & Kids, Best Magnesium Gummies for Sleep, Stress & Muscle Relief, Supports Bone & Nerve Health, Vegan, Pectin”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Ingredient evidence exists; on dose: label states 500 mg/serving — about 119% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 310–420 mg elemental; NIH sets 350 mg/day as the supplemental upper level for elemental magnesium). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate labels (glycinate, citrate) often state compound mass, which reads ~5–7× higher than elemental magnesium — the Supplement Facts panel settles which is meant.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Magnesium (as magnesium glycinate)
shaded = doses used in studies (200 mg–420 mg) · bar = this label
500 mg — above the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals

✓ Per-serving dose established✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID717504184050 — via source listing UPC
BrandTewuky
Source listing identifierB0F5HBYGF9
Retailer listing titleMagnesium Glycinate Gummies 2 Bottles, Sugar-Free for Adults & Kids, B…
show full title Magnesium Glycinate Gummies 2 Bottles, Sugar-Free for Adults & Kids, Best Magnesium Gummies for Sleep, Stress & Muscle Relief, Supports Bone & Nerve Health, Vegan, Pectin-Based, Blueberry Flavor
USPTO brand ownerShenzhen Jipasimai Technology Co., Ltd. (limited company (ltd.); China) · OTHER · China
Owner filed addressChina); Room 905, R&D Building 2, Yanxiang Technology Industrial Park,, Gaoxin Road, Dongzhou Community, Guangming Street, Guangming District,, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, 518000, CHINA

From the label (photo-read)

Serving sizeServing Size: 2 Gummies
Servings per container30
Pack statement60 GUMMIES
Badges printed on packSGS, 3rd Party Tested, Sugar-Free, COA Certified, GMP Certified, Sugar Free, Melatonin Free

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories15 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate3 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total sugars0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Magnesium (as magnesium glycinate)500 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“Muscle & Stress Relief” · “Best Form for Bedtime” · “Dietary supplement” · “Sugar Free” · “2 Pack” · “BLUEBERRY FLAVOR” · “A Melatonin-Free Nighttime Routine” · “Supports nighttime relaxation without adding melatonin*”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$35.96 checked Aug 02, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

MagnesiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,814) · UL 350 mg (SUPPLEMENTAL magnesium only (not from food))

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

magnesiumNIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet · PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation · WebMD: magnesium · ClinicalTrials.gov — 3,206 registered studies

Dosage: label states 500 mg/serving — about 119% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 310–420 mg elemental; NIH sets 350 mg/day as the supplemental upper level for elemental magnesium). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate labels (glycinate, citrate) often state compound mass, which reads ~5–7× higher than elemental magnesium — the Supplement Facts panel settles which is meant.

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 717504184050 · built August 02, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai