FDA recall appears in this brand's history
An exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.

FDA recall appears in this brand's history
Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
An exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.
A blend total may be legal, but it prevents you from knowing whether any individual ingredient reaches a meaningful amount.
The outside identifier points to this product, so the other checks are less likely to be about a look-alike.
Only product facts and comparisons earn a card. Pipeline gaps stay collapsed.
Open Food Facts resolves 727783006455 to "Fermented Zinc Complex" (New Chapter) — consistent with this listing.
Why it mattersThe outside identifier points to this product, so the other checks are less likely to be about a look-alike.
Open the source-linked findingBrand-level context only, not a finding about this product. New Chapter, Inc. recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2013-03-13: “The product may contain an undeclared allergen soy” (status: Terminated). The recalled product was: “NewChapter Probiotic Elderberry, 90…
Why it mattersAn exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.
Open the source-linked findingPublished sources describe how turmeric / curcumin, zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Turmeric, PubMed search: curcumin bioavailability piperine.
Why it mattersUse the linked research to check whether the ingredient and outcome you care about are actually connected. Ingredient evidence does not verify this product.
Open the source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
These links provide the public research context used alongside the captured panel. They do not establish safety, effectiveness, or product quality.
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Open Food Facts resolves 727783006455 to "Fermented Zinc Complex" (New Chapter) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Published sources describe how turmeric / curcumin, zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Turmeric, PubMed search: curcumin bioavailability piperine.
Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. New Chapter, Inc. recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2013-03-13: “The product may contain an undeclared allergen soy” (status: Terminated). The recalled product was: “NewChapter Probiotic Elderberry, 90 vegetarian capsules bottle. Dietary Supplement UPC: 7-27783-00123-8” — not necessarily the product on this page. Verify at FDA’s recall database.
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 202 on 2026-01-30 to 209 on 2026-06-29 (net +7). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 727783006455.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.