full reportFull record · 734189108027 · back to the summary
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 4 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 50 | — | |
| Total Carbohydrate | 2g | — | |
| Sodium | 18mg | — | |
| Creatine Monohydrate | 5000mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
USPTO lists Hefei Wandanyou Technology Co., Ltd. (limited company (ltd.); CHINA) (OTHER) in CHINA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Written reviews grew from 287 to 68 across 2026-02-05 – 2026-07-03 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~32).
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
The listing uses “pre-workout” framing, but published research attributes creatine monohydrate’s effect to studied as a daily supplement — the effect comes from muscle saturation over weeks, not from timing a dose before a workout. Sources: NIH ODS — Exercise & Athletic Performance fact sheet, Creatine stability by moisture and temperature (PubMed).
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Our image read produced 45 × 9.4129 g = 423.581 g versus net weight 135 g. OCR or variant mixing can cause this; check the physical package before treating it as a contradiction.
Technical check only: the panel’s 1 actives sum to 5,000 mg, which fits inside the ≈9,413 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
Creatine is stable as dry powder, while published stability research shows faster degradation as moisture and temperature rise. A gummy's delivered amount therefore depends on formulation and shelf-life testing; this record does not test this product.
This record does not currently hold an matched to this exact product public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 241 on 2026-01-26 to 68 on 2026-07-03 (net -173). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 734189108027.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing claim “…es are manufactured, tested and bottled in a GMP certified factory for the superior quality a…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Benefit claim “…Gummies – Pre-Workout Energy & Muscle Growth Support for Men & Women | Blueberry Electrolyte Gumm…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Creatine Monohydrate | shaded = doses used in studies (3 g–5 g) · bar = this label | 5 g — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 734189108027 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Natures Aid |
| Source listing identifier | B0F3JBGGGZ |
| Retailer listing title | Natures Aid NSF Certified Creatine Gummy 5g - Creatine Monohydrate Gum… show full titleNatures Aid NSF Certified Creatine Gummy 5g - Creatine Monohydrate Gummies – Pre-Workout Energy & Muscle Growth Support for Men & Women | Blueberry Electrolyte Gummies (135 Count) |
| USPTO brand owner | Hefei Wandanyou Technology Co., Ltd. (limited company (ltd.); CHINA) · OTHER · CHINA |
| Owner filed address | CHINA); Room 328, Shuangying Avenue, No. 777 Yulan Avenue, High-tech Zone, Hefei, Anhui, 230000, CHINA |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving Size: 3 Gummies |
| Servings per container | 45 |
| Net weight | 135G |
| Pack statement | 135 GUMMIES |
| Badges printed on pack | VEGAN, NSF CERTIFIED, NON GMO, GLUTEN FREE, SOY FREE, GMP CERTIFIED, NSF CERTIFIED FOR SPORT, CONTENTS CERTIFIED |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 50 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrate | 2g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 18mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Creatine Monohydrate | 5000mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“100% REAL CREATINE” · “ADVANCED COMPLEX HIGH ABSORPTION” · “MUSCLE GROWTH*” · “IMPROVE ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE*” · “BOOST STRENGTH*” · “VERIFIED BY INDEPENDENT LABS” · “WE WELCOME (AND PAY FOR) YOUR AUDIT. RANSPARENCY IS OUR PROMISE.” · “THIRD PARTY AUTHORITATIVE TESTING, THE INGREDIENT CONTENT IS CLEAR AT A GLANCE.”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Ingredient science — creatine monohydrate · Grade A
Ingredient science — NIH references
Creatine — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (4,996) · studied 3-5 g/day; no UL
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
creatine monohydrate — NIH ODS — Exercise & Athletic Performance fact sheet · Creatine stability by moisture and temperature (PubMed) · ISSN position stand on creatine (PubMed) · PubMed search: creatine monohydrate supplementation · WebMD: creatine · ClinicalTrials.gov — 2,506 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: studied as a daily supplement — the effect comes from muscle saturation over weeks, not from timing a dose before a workout.
⚠ Consistency note: the listing markets “pre-workout” framing, but published research attributes this ingredient's effect to sustained daily use — the marketing frame and the research mechanism don't line up.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 734189108027 · built July 24, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai