LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Start with the question · Life Extension

Life Extension Optimized Resveratrol Elite, Trans-resveratrol

Resveratrol Elite™ Proprietary Blend publishes one combined total, not its individual ingredient doses.

Rebuilt from public sources on July 22, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.

What this means for you · Start with the question

Why this deserves a closer look

The panel lists “Resveratrol Elite™ Proprietary Blend” as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.

Specific fact confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Life Extension Foundation, Inc. (['CORPORATION', 'CORPORATION']) in ['FLORIDA, USA', 'FLORIDA, USA'] for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by i…

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

8declared rows
6separately quantified
2combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes 6 separately quantified rows and 2 combined blend totals. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Resveratrol Elite™ Proprietary Blend222 mg
Bio-Quercetin® Proprietary Blend9 mg
quercetin3 mg
galactomannans2.7 mg
trans-resveratrol18%
See 3 more panel rows in the full report →

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as declared panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Public ownership record
🇺🇸
Life Extension Foundation, Inc.['Corporation', 'Corporation'] · exact mark owner for LIFE EXTENSION

3600 West Commercial Blvd., Ft. Lauderdale, FLORIDA 33309, UNITED STATES

Registered2010-05-18
AssignmentsYes

Filed address
3600 West Commercial Blvd., Ft. Lauderdale, FLORIDA 33309, UNITED STATES

This is the USPTO owner of the brand wordmark. It tells a shopper who is behind the brand, but does not by itself identify the manufacturer or prove where this product was made.

Review history
/ 5
not shownvisible ratings

Review counts rose gradually. Written-review counts rose from 76 to 86 across the observed period. That describes count movement, not review authenticity or product quality. A variation family may share some public counts.

Keepa exact-listing history · counts do not prove authenticity · variation family may share counts

Want the complete evidence trail?

The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.

Read / share full evidence →
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check

Confirmed evidence

What checked out02

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Life Extension Foundation, Inc. (['CORPORATION', 'CORPORATION']) in ['FLORIDA, USA', 'FLORIDA, USA'] for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Barcode confirmed in an outside database

UPCitemdb resolves 737870223061 to "Life Extension Optimized Resveratrol Elite™ - Live a Long Healthy Life with Tra" (Life Extension) — consistent with this listing.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution01

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

Ingredient amounts hidden in a blend

The panel lists “Resveratrol Elite™ Proprietary Blend” as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing04

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

No data

No label filed with NIH's public catalog

The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 76 on 2026-01-30 to 86 on 2026-07-10 (net +10). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

2

Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?

“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.

3

What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?

A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 737870223061.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

Record built July 22, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.