Full record · 742970497670 · back to the summary
Shilajit Capsules, Himalayan Organic Shilajit for Men and Women
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
What the label discloses
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 1 declared row. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shilajit Extract | 18,000 MG | — | |
| ASHWAGANDHA | — | — | |
| RHODIOLA ROSEA | — | — | |
| TURMERIC | — | — | |
| CORDYCEPS MUSHROOM | — | — | |
| STINGING NETTLE | — | — | |
| GINKGO BILOBA | — | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a declared “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those declared amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as declared panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
No data yet: Testing claimed — documentation not found
The listing claims third-party testing without naming any lab or certifier, so the claim can't be verified as stated.
Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how turmeric / curcumin, ashwagandha have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Turmeric, PubMed search: curcumin bioavailability piperine.
Not found in NIH's DSLD label registry
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
No exact supplement trademark owner found
The live USPTO search returned no exact-wordmark supplement-related registration for this brand. That is a public-record gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.
UPC valid, no independent record
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 0 on 2026-03-06 to 143 on 2026-07-15 (net +143). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…nt, free from GMOs and artificial additives. Lab-tested for purity, ensuring you receive only the hi…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: a named laboratory, a certificate of analysis, or a certification-registry entry | No named laboratory, no certificate of analysis, and no certification-registry entry matching this product was located. |
| Manufacturing claim “…ules DIETRAY SUPPLEMENTS DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS GMP FDA” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | Facility-level claims can be accurate and still say nothing about this product’s contents. No registration document was located. |
| Benefit claim “…is Natural Organic Shilajit with fulvic acid enhances energy, focus & endurance for men and women.…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| turmeric / curcumin | Studies typically use 500 mg–2 g. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible. | |
| ashwagandha | Studies typically use 250 mg–600 mg. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible. | |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 2 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 742970497670 |
| Brand | naypiny |
| Source listing identifier | B0FMJWTMVZ |
| Retailer listing title | Shilajit Capsules, Himalayan Organic Shilajit for Men and Women, with … show full titleShilajit Capsules, Himalayan Organic Shilajit for Men and Women, with Ashwagandha Ginseng, Fulvic Acid and More Trace Minerals - 120 Capsules |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Per Serving |
| Servings per container | 60 |
| Pack statement | 120 Veggie Capsules |
| Badges printed on pack | GMP, FDA |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Shilajit Extract | 18,000 MG | High clearly legible in the photo |
| ASHWAGANDHA | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| RHODIOLA ROSEA | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| TURMERIC | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| CORDYCEPS MUSHROOM | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| STINGING NETTLE | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| GINKGO BILOBA | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“85+ TRACE MINERALS” · “FULVIC ACID AND HUMIC ACID” · “HIMALAYAN GOLD GRADE” · “POWERFUL” · “DAILY FORMULA” · “Fulvic Acid + Humic Acid” · “BOTANICAL COMPLEX” · “A blend of well-known herbs and mushrooms in convenient capsules”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Ashwagandha — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (204) · botanical; liver-injury case reports exist
Turmeric — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,288) · botanical; rare hepatotoxicity reports
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the declared amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
turmeric / curcumin — NIH NCCIH — Turmeric · PubMed search: curcumin bioavailability piperine · WebMD: turmeric · ClinicalTrials.gov — 286 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: plain curcumin absorbs poorly — most positive trials pair it with piperine (black pepper) or a bioavailability-enhanced form.
ashwagandha — NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha · PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial · WebMD: ashwagandha · ClinicalTrials.gov — 78 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily use over 6–12 weeks in studies; extract concentration matters (root powder ≠ standardized extract).
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 742970497670 · built July 22, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai