lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 755571961952 · back to the summary

Metagenics UltraFlora Fiber, Prebiotic & Probiotic

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built August 02, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00755571961952 · checked 2026-07-31

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

6listed rows
6separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 6 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories10
Total Carbohydrate5 g
Dietary Fiber4 g
Partially hydrolyzed guar gum4.1 g
Soluble tapioca fiber500 mg
Bacillus coagulans Unique IS-210 mg

vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out3

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists METAGENICS, INC. (CORPORATION; LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in CALIFORNIA, USA; DELAWARE, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

The review count moved gradually, not in one burst

Written reviews rose from 0 to 3 between March 25 and July 24, 2026. No single 30-day window in the dated series shows a rise.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing8

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Listed amounts fit the serving

Technical check only: the panel’s 3 actives sum to 4,610 mg, which fits inside the ≈5,200 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.

No data

Photo-read pack math is internally consistent

7 servings × 5.2 g = 36.4 g, matching the printed net weight 36.1 g (NET WT. 1.27 oz (36.1 g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.

No data

FDA recall appears in this brand's history

This recall is not about the product on this page. Metagenics, Inc. recalled a different product on July 3, 2014. FDA has since closed that case. The recalled item was “UltraBalance Protein Powder, Net Wt. 14.8 oz (420g)”. FDA recorded the reason as “Metagenics is recalling UltraBalance Protein powder because it may contain undeclared soy”. Verify at FDA’s recall database.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 0 on 2026-03-25 to 3 on 2026-07-24 (net +3). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Which specific study supports this claim — and was it run on this exact formula?

Ask for the citation, how many people took part, the dose used, and whether the study tested this product or just one ingredient in it. Ingredient research is not product evidence.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

3

Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?

An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 755571961952.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Clinical-evidence claim
“…CLINICALLY TESTED INGREDIENTS…”
No evidence located
We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula
We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product.
Professional-endorsement claim
“…From a Professional Brand You Can Trust: Developed by Metagenics, the number one doctor-recommended professional supplement brand; science-driven formulas trusted by 50,”
Marketing credential
We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers
A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed.
Benefit claim
“Metagenics UltraFlora Fiber, Prebiotic & Probiotic - Dietary Fiber Supplement Powder - Supports Bowel Regularity, Microbiome Balance & Gut Comfort - Orange Flavor - 7 Ser”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Dietary Fiber
shaded = doses used in studies (3 g–10 g) · bar = this label
4 g — within the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID755571961952 — via source listing UPC
BrandMetagenics
Source listing identifierB0GGTLFD13
Retailer listing titleMetagenics UltraFlora Fiber, Prebiotic & Probiotic - Dietary Fiber Sup…
show full title Metagenics UltraFlora Fiber, Prebiotic & Probiotic - Dietary Fiber Supplement Powder - Supports Bowel Regularity, Microbiome Balance & Gut Comfort - Orange Flavor - 7 Servings
USPTO brand ownerMETAGENICS, INC. · CORPORATION; LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · CALIFORNIA, USA; DELAWARE, USA
Owner filed address100 Avenida La Pata, San Clemente, CALIFORNIA 92672, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving sizeServing Size 1 Stick Pack (5.2 g)
Servings per container7
Net weightNET WT. 1.27 oz (36.1 g)
Pack statement7-0.18 oz (5.2 g) PACKETS
Badges printed on packCLINICALLY TESTED INGREDIENTS, Non-GMO, Gluten-free, Sugar-free, Dairy-free, Soy-free

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories10 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate5 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Dietary Fiber4 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Partially hydrolyzed guar gum4.1 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Soluble tapioca fiber500 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Bacillus coagulans Unique IS-210 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“PRACTITIONER RECOMMENDED” · “GUT HEALTH” · “Supports daily digestive regularity & balance*” · “ORANGE FLAVOR with other natural flavors” · “Provides 24 hour gut support*” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “Meet the fiber that does more” · “Up to 3x more bowel movements weekly, without laxatives”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$14.95 checked Aug 02, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Official brand domain: www.metagenics.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Related research & consistency

prebiotic fiber (inulin-type)NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 755571961952 · built August 02, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai