“Certified”
Evidence →“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Exact product checked · GTIN 00762765507117MadNutra · checked Aug 4, 2026 · on sale since Aug 17, 2025🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · MADNUTRA LLC · Delaware, USAPackage says manufactured for: Mathura LLC · 2010 N Church St.
Quick read · MadNutra
Ashwagandha 675mg
Checked against public sources on August 4, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
60tablets
Does the marketing hold up?
Package and trademark records name different responsible entities. The package says manufactured for: Mathura LLC, 2010 N Church St.. USPTO names MADNUTRA LLC as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the saved…
Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified2 ingredients listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costsNo price found for this exact barcode
Is it tested?No testing claim made
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸MADNUTRA LLClimited liability company · Delaware, USA
Is it the real thing?✓Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?✓No recalls found
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
1◖ partly confirmed1△ support not found1? couldn’t verifyno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Organic A shwagandha Root Powder | 675 mg |
|---|---|
| Organic Black Papper (fruit) | 5 mg |
Printed on the package: Made in USA · Vegan-Friendly · GMP Certified · GMP · Non-GMO
We read 2 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
Marketing claims, checked
The checks, one by one
1 promise needs a closer look.
◐Partly confirmed1
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
△Claimed without support found1
“ADAPTOGENIC FORMULA: Each serving of this premium ashwagandha dietary supplement delivers 675mg of potent Ashwagandha extract, standardized to key…”
Evidence →We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product.
?Couldn’t verify independently1
“IN”
Evidence →“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Quick read · 3 useful findings
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Public contextIs the label honest?
The headline amount is not tied to a panel row for the same ingredient
You are being sold on an ingredient the verified panel does not separately declare. The brand should explain the mismatch.
Evidence and sources
The listing presents 675 mg for ashwagandha, but vision:claude-cli:subscription does not contain a same-name quantified row. The saved image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingCheckedIs the label honest?
Every ingredient shows its amount · 2 ingredients listed.
Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
Evidence and sources
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingCheckedCan you trust the review pattern?
Reviews rose from 12 to 28 between April 7 and July 27, 2026 — no sudden jump.
A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Evidence and sources
Written reviews rose from 12 to 28 between April 7 and July 27, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 9, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 3
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
- Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
MADNUTRA LLCLimited Liability Company · exact supplement-class mark for MADNUTRA
Filed address
2810 North Church Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19802, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Research behind the findings
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Where it sells
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$22.99
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Aug 5, 2026
View on Amazon ↗iHerb
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built August 05, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.