Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists Lin, Fangping (INDIVIDUAL) in China for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Full record · 768381799042 · back to the summary
Mushroom Coffee, Instant Mushroom Coffee with Cordyceps
Exact product checkedGTIN 00768381799042 · checked 2026-07-25
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
7listed rows
6separately quantified
1combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes 6 separately ingredients with amounts and 1 combined blend total. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Fat | 1 g | — | |
| Saturated Fat | 1 g | — | |
| Trans Fat | 0 g | — | |
| Sodium | 10 mg | — | |
| Total Carbohydrate | 1 g | — | |
| Protein | <1 g | — | |
| Mushroom Blend | 2000 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out2
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Reviews accumulated gradually
Written reviews grew from 478 to 598 across 2026-02-08 – 2026-07-13 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~32).
Documented concerns
What needs caution1
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing6
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Listed amounts fit the serving
Technical check only: the panel’s 3 actives sum to 3,000 mg, which fits inside the ≈6,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
Photo-read pack math is internally consistent
30 servings × 6 g = 180 g, matching the printed net weight 180 g (NET WT.6.35OZ (180g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
Public label filing not saved
This record does not currently hold an matched to this exact product public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 458 on 2026-01-29 to 598 on 2026-07-13 (net +140). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
UPC valid, no independent record
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
2
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 768381799042.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Benefit claim “…ne for Energy, Focus, Positive Mood & Immune Support (30 Servings) Premium Mushroom and Coffee Bl…” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 768381799042 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | YEGE |
| Source listing identifier | B0DJSKQRPM |
| Retailer listing title | Mushroom Coffee, Instant Mushroom Coffee with Cordyceps, Reishi, King … show full titleMushroom Coffee, Instant Mushroom Coffee with Cordyceps, Reishi, King Trumpet, Shiitake, Turkey Tail, Lions Mane for Energy, Focus, Positive Mood & Immune Support (30 Servings) |
| USPTO brand owner | Lin, Fangping · INDIVIDUAL · China |
| Owner filed address | Yongchun County, No.522, Dashan Village, Dapu Town, Quanzhou City, 362600, CHINA |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 Tbsp (6g) |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Net weight | NET WT.6.35OZ (180g) |
| Badges printed on pack | 100% VEGAN, SUGAR FREE, GLUTEN FREE, NON GMO, SOY FREE, VEGAN |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Total Fat | 1 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Saturated Fat | 1 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Trans Fat | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 10 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrate | 1 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Protein | <1 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Mushroom Blend | 2000 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Medium Roast” · “Freshly Ground Coffee” · “Natural Mushrooms” · “Add MCT” · “0 Sugar” · “Natural mushroom” · “POWERFUL MUSHROOMS” · “LESS CAFFEINE”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $17.95 checked Jul 25, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Record 768381799042 · built July 25, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai