lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 791126684747 · back to the summary

Fiber and Greens Powder - GLP-1 Friendly Gut & Superfood Blend

2 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built July 26, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00791126684747 · checked 2026-07-26

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

16listed rows
15separately quantified
1combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes 15 separately ingredients with amounts and 1 combined blend total. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories25
Total Carbohydrate9 g
Dietary Fiber8 g
Vitamin D (as Vegan Cholecalciferol)20 mcg
Vitamin K (as Menaquinone-7)80 mcg
Iron6 mg
Magnesium100 mg
Zinc1 mg
Sodium55 mg
Potassium665 mg
Psyllium Husk Powder4350 mg
Chicory Root Inulin2750 mg
Acacia Gum2000 mg
Proprietary Greens Blend1000 mg
LactoSpore® (15 Billion CFU/gram)68 mg
Guarana Extract (Seed) (std. to 22% caffeine)140 mg

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out2

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Barcode confirmed in an outside database

Open Food Facts resolves 791126684747 to "Fiber + Greens" (HONA) — consistent with this listing.

Confirmed

The review count moved gradually, not in one burst

Written reviews fell from 58 to 49 between March 3 and July 22, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 2, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution1

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

Ingredient amounts hidden in a blend

The panel lists “Proprietary Greens Blend” as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing8

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Listed amounts fit the serving

Technical check only: the panel’s 12 actives sum to 11,080 mg, which fits inside the ≈13,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.

No data

Photo-read pack math is internally consistent

30 servings × 13 g = 390 g, matching the printed net weight 360 g (Net Wt. 12.7 oz (360g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how magnesium, prebiotic fiber, zinc, multivitamin / greens blend have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 56 on 2026-02-01 to 49 on 2026-07-22 (net -7). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

Brand ownership record not saved

This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

2

What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?

A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 791126684747.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Manufacturing claim
“…ularity Your daily dose of gut goodness. NSF GMP CERTIFIED GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE Non-GM…”
Partly supported
We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Benefit claim
“…otics, probiotics and functional vitamins to support digestion at the foundation. Your gut will t…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Magnesium
shaded = doses used in studies (200 mg–420 mg) · bar = this label
100 mg — below the studied range
Dietary Fiber
shaded = doses used in studies (3 g–10 g) · bar = this label
8 g — within the studied range
Zinc
shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label
1 mg — below the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID791126684747 — via source listing UPC
BrandHona Fiber + Greens
Source listing identifierB0DG9SQ79S
Retailer listing titleFiber and Greens Powder - GLP-1 Friendly Gut & Superfood Blend, Greens…
show full title Fiber and Greens Powder - GLP-1 Friendly Gut & Superfood Blend, Greens Superfood Powder with 8g Fiber, Prebiotics, Probiotics & Natural Caffeine, Gluten Free, Sugar Free, Vegan, 30 Servings

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 Scoop/Packet (13 g)
Servings per container30
Net weightNet Wt. 12.7 oz (360g)
Badges printed on packNSF, GMP CERTIFIED, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE, Non-GMO, Gluten-Free, Dairy-Free, Soy-Free, Sugar-Free

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories25 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate9 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Dietary Fiber8 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin D (as Vegan Cholecalciferol)20 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin K (as Menaquinone-7)80 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Iron6 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Magnesium100 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Zinc1 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium55 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Potassium665 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Psyllium Husk Powder4350 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Chicory Root Inulin2750 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Acacia Gum2000 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Proprietary Greens Blend1000 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
LactoSpore® (15 Billion CFU/gram)68 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Guarana Extract (Seed) (std. to 22% caffeine)140 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“DIGESTIVE FIBER FOR REGULARITY” · “PRE & PROBIOTICS FOR GUT HEALTH” · “ORGANIC GREENS FOR NUTRITION” · “KEY ELECTROLYTES FOR HYDRATION” · “VITAMIN D3 + K2 + MG FOR WELLNESS” · “Supports Gut Health” · “Helps Eliminate Bloating” · “Boosts Natural Energy”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$57.99 checked Jul 26, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin DNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)

Vitamin KNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,124) · no UL established; interacts with warfarin

IronNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (28,479) · UL 45 mg (adults, from all sources)

MagnesiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,814) · UL 350 mg (SUPPLEMENTAL magnesium only (not from food))

ZincNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)

PotassiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

magnesiumNIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet · PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation · WebMD: magnesium · ClinicalTrials.gov — 3,206 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold.

prebiotic fiber (inulin-type)NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.

zincNIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.

multivitamin / greens blendNIH ODS — Multivitamin/mineral supplements fact sheet · PubMed search: multivitamin supplementation outcomes · ClinicalTrials.gov — 497 registered studies

Use pattern in research: research evaluates multivitamins ingredient-by-ingredient — blend-level health claims outrun what blend-level evidence can show.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 791126684747 · built July 26, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai