lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 798295548931 · back to the summary

Seeking Health Optimal Electrolyte Powder - with Sodium & Potassium

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built July 27, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00798295548931 · checked 2026-07-27

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

8listed rows
7separately quantified
1combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes 7 separately ingredients with amounts and 1 combined blend total. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories16
Total Carbohydrates1 g
Niacin (as inositol hexanicotinate)25 mg
Magnesium (as Di-Magnesium Malate)(Albion®)125 mg
Chloride (from Himalayan pink salt)233 mg
Sodium (from Himalayan pink salt)150 mg
Potassium (as potassium bicarbonate)500 mg
Hydration blend:1.6 g

vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out1

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Seeking Health, LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in Washington, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution1

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

Ingredient amounts hidden in a blend

The panel lists “Hydration blend:” as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing8

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Listed amounts fit the serving

Technical check only: the panel’s 5 actives sum to 2,483 mg, which fits inside the ≈6,400 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.

No data

Photo-read pack math is internally consistent

30 servings × 6.4 g = 192 g, matching the printed net weight 192 g (NET WT 192 G (6.77 OZ)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how magnesium have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

FDA recall appears in this brand's history

This recall is not about the product on this page. Seeking Health LLC recalled a different product on September 16, 2022. FDA has since closed that case. The recalled item was “Seeking Health brand Optimal Multivitamin Chewable Dietary Supplement tablets, 60 chewable tablets per package. Product is packaged in white non-flex plastic bottles. UPC: 8100075”. FDA recorded the reason as “The product label claim for copper is 0.5mg, but third-party lab results revealed product contains higher levels of copper”. Verify at FDA’s recall database.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 121 on 2025-08-07 to 125 on 2026-07-21 (net +4). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

2

What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?

A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 798295548931.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Benefit claim
“Seeking Health Optimal Electrolyte Powder - with Sodium & Potassium - Support Digestion & Energy with Magnesium Electrolyte Supplement - Berry, 30 Servings…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Magnesium (as Di-Magnesium Malate)(Albion®)
shaded = doses used in studies (200 mg–420 mg) · bar = this label
125 mg — below the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID798295548931 — via source listing UPC
BrandSeeking Health
Source listing identifierB00O2JQWCA
Retailer listing titleSeeking Health Optimal Electrolyte Powder - with Sodium & Potassium - …
show full title Seeking Health Optimal Electrolyte Powder - with Sodium & Potassium - Support Digestion & Energy with Magnesium Electrolyte Supplement - Berry, 30 Servings
USPTO brand ownerSeeking Health, LLC · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · Washington, USA
Owner filed address3140 Mercer Avenue, Bellingham, Washington 98225, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 Heaping Scoop (6.4 g)
Servings per container30
Net weightNET WT 192 G (6.77 OZ)
Badges printed on packSuitable for Vegan, Not suitable for Infants, Suitable for Ages 4 and Up, Dairy Free, Egg Free, Fish Free, Shellfish Free, Tree Nuts Free

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories16 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrates1 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Niacin (as inositol hexanicotinate)25 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Magnesium (as Di-Magnesium Malate)(Albion®)125 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Chloride (from Himalayan pink salt)233 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium (from Himalayan pink salt)150 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Potassium (as potassium bicarbonate)500 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Hydration blend:1.6 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“Berry Flavored” · “Supports full body intracellular hydration for a healthy brain, heart, blood flow and muscles.'” · “Berry and Orange Flavored” · “Hydration Blend with key ingredients for hydration support*” · “Science-Backed” · “Wellness” · “Supports healthy muscle contraction” · “& relaxation and healthy heart rhythm”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$40.00 checked Jul 27, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Official brand domain: www.seekinghealth.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

NiacinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)

MagnesiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,814) · UL 350 mg (SUPPLEMENTAL magnesium only (not from food))

PotassiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

magnesiumNIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet · PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation · WebMD: magnesium · ClinicalTrials.gov — 3,206 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 798295548931 · built July 27, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai