Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists NaturaLife Labs, Inc (CORPORATION) in California, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Full record · 804540020746 · back to the summary
NaturaLife Labs Organic Ashwagandha 2100 mg per Serving
Exact product checkedGTIN 00804540020746 · checked 2026-09-03
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
The named ingredient is not separately quantified
MARKETING2.1 g — per-serving claim
PANELPanel read — named ingredient amount not separately listedTotal Blend 2.1 g
named amount openThe panel was read, but it does not give a separate amount for ashwagandha. The listing claim cannot be compared to a named panel row.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | — | |
| Total Carbohydrates | 2 g | — | |
| Iron | 1 mg | — | |
| Total Blend | 2,100 mg | — | |
| Organic Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) (Root) Powder, Organic Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) (Root) Extract (2.5% Withanolides). | — | — | |
| Organic Black Pepper (Piper nigrum) (Fruit) (Extract) | 8 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out3
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Full label filed with NIH — ingredients on public record
Label #229134 “Ashwagandha 2100 mg” (NaturaLife Labs), entered 2020-06-24, with the full Supplement Facts on file. Company on file: Distributor — NaturaLife Labs, Inc., Torrance, CA.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
UPCitemdb resolves 804540020746 to "Organic Ashwagandha 2 100 mg - 100 Vegan Capsules Pure Organic Ashwagandha Powde" (NaturaLife Labs) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
What needs caution2
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Dose is higher than studies used
label claims 2100 mg/serving — above the range commonly used in research (trials mostly use 250–600 mg/day of root extract). Sources: NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha, PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing8
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math
The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.
“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named
The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
The headline amount is not tied to a panel row for the same ingredient
The listing presents 2,100 mg for ashwagandha, but vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash does not contain a same-name quantified row. The saved image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.
Cost to reach a studied dose
At 1.0 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (250–600 mg), this product runs roughly $19 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how ashwagandha have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha, PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial.
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 7,511 on 2025-10-27 to 7,670 on 2026-08-18 (net +159). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
2
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
3
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 804540020746.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…LAB Purity & Potency TESTED…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page repeats a testing claim but names no issuer; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Manufacturing claim “…5% withanolides), and organic black pepper ✔️ USDA Certified Organic, Non-GMO, Gluten-Free, and Vegan ✔️ No fillers, magnesium stearate, dioxides, or artificial additive” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Origin claim “…5% withanolides), and organic black pepper ✔️ USDA Certified Organic, Non-GMO, Gluten-Free, and Vegan ✔️ No fillers, magnesium stearate, dioxides, or artificial additive” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| ashwagandha | Studies typically use 250 mg–600 mg. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible. | |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 5 of 6 public signals
✓ Per-serving dose established✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD)✓ Brand's own store found· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 804540020746 |
| Brand | NaturaLife Labs |
| Source listing identifier | B06ZYHJYD5 |
| Retailer listing title | NaturaLife Labs Organic Ashwagandha 2100 mg per Serving – Full Spectru… show full titleNaturaLife Labs Organic Ashwagandha 2100 mg per Serving – Full Spectrum Root Powder and Standardized Extract (Withanolides) – 100 Capsules – Vegan – Non-GMO, Gluten-Free |
| USPTO brand owner | NaturaLife Labs, Inc · CORPORATION · California, USA |
| Owner filed address | 21515 Hawthorne Blvd suite 200, Torrance, California 90503, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 3 Capsules |
| Servings per container | 33 |
| Pack statement | 100 Capsules |
| Badges printed on pack | USDA ORGANIC, MFD IN THE USA, Vegan, Allergen Free, LAB Purity & Potency TESTED, THIRD PARTY TESTED, MADE WITH NON-GMO INGREDIENTS, ORGANIC, FULL SPECTRUM |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 10 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrates | 2 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Iron | 1 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Blend | 2,100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Organic Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) (Root) Powder, Orga | None | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Organic Black Pepper (Piper nigrum) (Fruit) (Extract) | 8 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“2100 mg per serving” · “Formulated with care” · “Manufactured in the USA with domestic and international ingredients.” · “Free of: milk, eggs, fish, crustacean shellfish, tree nuts, peanuts, wheat, soybeans, and sesame.” · “Only the essentials: organic root powder and extract enhanced with black pepper, no fillers or binders” · “Full spectrum organic ashwagandha” · “Clean, Simple, and Transparent Formula” · “Verified Through Third-Party Testing”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Supplement Facts — NIH DSLD registry
serving: 3 Capsule(s) · contents: 100 Veggie Capsule(s) · label #229134 at dsld.od.nih.gov
| Ingredient | Amount per serving |
|---|---|
| Total Blend | 2100 mg |
mcg = 1/1,000 of a mg. As filed in the NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database — the authoritative digitization of the printed label. Label versions can lag reformulations.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $21.43 checked Sep 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Brand store naturalifelabs.com: 2 supplement products (+13 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Related research & consistency
ashwagandha — NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha · PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial · WebMD: ashwagandha · ClinicalTrials.gov — 78 registered studies
ℹ Dosage: label claims 2100 mg/serving — above the range commonly used in research (trials mostly use 250–600 mg/day of root extract).
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily use over 6–12 weeks in studies; extract concentration matters (root powder ≠ standardized extract).
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 804540020746 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai