Full record · 810014675039 · back to the summary
Nutricost Collagen Peptides Powder 1LB (454 G)
3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built September 03, 2026

Exact product checkedGTIN 00810014675039 · checked 2026-07-21
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
The 11 g grass-fed collagen hydrolysate claim matches the panel
MARKETING11 g — listing title
PANELGrass-Fed Collagen Hydrolysate 11 g — same amountGrass-Fed Collagen Hydrolysate 11 g
matches panelWe did the comparison: the listing claims 11 g of grass-fed collagen hydrolysate, and the listing-image panel shows 11 g grass-fed collagen hydrolysate 1 scoop (11g). Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|
| Calories | 40 | — | |
| Protein | 10g | — | |
| Iron | 1mg | — | |
| Sodium | 35mg | — | |
| Grass-Fed Collagen Hydrolysate | 11g | — | |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out2
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
✓
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists eSupplements, LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in UTAH, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Confirmed✓
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
Open Food Facts resolves 810014675039 to "Collagen Peptides" (nutricost) — consistent with this listing.
ConfirmedDocumented concerns
What needs caution0
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing8
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
…
Listed amounts fit the serving
Technical check only: the panel’s 2 actives sum to 11,001 mg, which fits inside the ≈11,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
No data…
Photo-read pack math is internally consistent
41 servings × 11 g = 451 g, matching the printed net weight 454 g (NET WT. 16.2 OZ (1 LB) (454 G)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
No data…
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how collagen peptides have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.
No data…
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
No data…
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
No data…
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
No data…
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 229 on 2025-08-09 to 370 on 2026-08-26 (net +141). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
No data…
Package and trademark records name different responsible entitie
The package says manufactured for: nutricos†, 351 E 1750 N, Vineyard, UT 84059. USPTO names eSupplements, LLC as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the saved records do not establish the relationship.
No dataWhat to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Answered by the panel: 11 g of the 11 g headline is collagen. Which independent lab can confirm that amount in this product?
The panel resolves the front-label arithmetic. The remaining question is lot-specific contents and stability; published category testing gives context, not a test of this product.
2
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
3
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 810014675039.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…THIRD PARTY TESTED…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Manufacturing claim “…t Collagen Hydrolysate To Work For You With 11 Grams of Collagen Per Serving (Scoop Included) Superior Mixability With Nutricost Collagen That Dissolves Easily In Water ” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|
| Grass-Fed Collagen Hydrolysate | shaded = doses used in studies (2.5 g–15 g) · bar = this label | 11 g — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 810014675039 |
| Brand | Nutricost |
| Source listing identifier | B06XKM7P97 |
| Retailer listing title | Nutricost Collagen Peptides Powder 1LB (454 G), Grass Fed Bovine | Col… show full title Nutricost Collagen Peptides Powder 1LB (454 G), Grass Fed Bovine | Collagen Hydrolysate, Unflavored |
| USPTO brand owner | eSupplements, LLC · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · UTAH, USA |
| Owner filed address | UTAH, USA) DBA Nutricost; 351 E 1750 N, VINEYARD, UTAH 84059, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 Scoop (11g) |
| Servings per container | 41 |
| Net weight | NET WT. 16.2 OZ (1 LB) (454 G) |
| Pack statement | 1LB PER BOTTLE |
| Badges printed on pack | GRASS-FED, QUALITY nutricoST GUARANTEED, THIRD PARTY TESTED, GMP COMPLIANT FACILITY, GRASS-FED COLLAGEN, NON-GMO, GLUTEN-FREE, nutricost Quality GUARANTEED, QUALITY GUARANTEED, GMO PRODUCT, GMP COMPLI |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|
| Calories | 40 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Protein | 10g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Iron | 1mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 35mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Grass-Fed Collagen Hydrolysate | 11g | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“UNFLAVORED” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “11G COLLAGEN PEPTIDES” · “41 SERVINGS” · “1LB PER BOTTLE” · “nutricost Quality” · “Grass-Fed Collagen” · “Non-GMO Product”
Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Listed ingredients (as stated on the listing)
Grass-Fed Collagen Hydrolysate
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $35.05 checked Sep 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Brand store nutricost.com: 199 supplement products (+51 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Iron — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (28,479) · UL 45 mg (adults, from all sources)
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Record 810014675039 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai