lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 810014679440 · back to the summary

Nutricost Niacin (Vitamin B3) 500mg, 240 Capsules

4 concrete dimensions confirmed · 1 still open · built July 25, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00810014679440 · checked 2026-07-25

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The 500 mg niacin (as nicotinic acid) claim matches the panel

MARKETING500 mg — per-serving claim
PANELNiacin (as nicotinic acid) 500 mg — same amountNiacin (as nicotinic acid) 500 mg
matches panel

We did the comparison: the listing claims 500 mg of niacin (as nicotinic acid), and the listing-image panel shows 500 mg niacin (as nicotinic acid) 1 capsule. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Niacin (as nicotinic acid)500 mg

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out4

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Testing claim names a recognized certifier

A named certifier/laboratory appears in the listing (registry cross-check pending).

Confirmed

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists eSupplements, LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in UTAH, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Reviews accumulated gradually

Written reviews grew from 1436 to 1489 across 2026-02-08 – 2026-07-13 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~13).

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution1

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

Dose claim implausibly high for a capsule

Claimed niacin 500.0 mg is 100% of the ≈500 mg serving (serving size on the label, keyed to UPC 810014679440) — above what gummy matrices realistically carry.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing6

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Listing claim matches the label panel

The listing claims 500 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Niacin (as nicotinic acid) at 500 mg per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.

No data

Public label filing not saved

This record does not currently hold an matched to this exact product public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 1,433 on 2026-01-28 to 1,489 on 2026-07-13 (net +56). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

Barcode record is too sparse to confirm identity

Open Food Facts resolves 810014679440 to "" (Nuticost), but that record lacks enough exact brand/product detail to confirm or contradict this listing.

No data

Package and trademark records name different responsible entitie

The package says manufactured for: nutricost, 351 E 1750 N, Vineyard, UT 84059. USPTO names eSupplements, LLC as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the saved records do not establish the relationship.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Answered by the panel: 0.5 g of the 0.5 g headline is niacin. Which independent lab can confirm that amount in this product?

The panel resolves the front-label arithmetic. The remaining question is lot-specific contents and stability; published category testing gives context, not a test of this product.

2

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

3

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 810014679440.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…ease Niacin Per Bottle Non-GMO, Gluten Free, 3rd Party Tested Manufactured in an NSF Certified, GMP Compli…”
Partly supported
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
A testing body is named on the listing, but we found no lot-specific certificate of analysis.
Manufacturing claim
“…rty Tested Manufactured in an NSF Certified, GMP Compliant, FDA Registered Facility DIETARY S…”
Partly supported
We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Benefit claim
“…acinamide. Consuming On An Empty Stomach May Increase Flush Reaction 240 Capsules of fast release…”
Not checked yet
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

Label math — claimed dose vs. serving mass
Why is this shown?
Simple physics: the claimed dose has to weigh less than the whole serving. We compare the milligrams promised on the label to the weight of one serving, from the label itself. If the claim fits — even at a small percentage, which is normal, since servings include binders and flavoring — the label is at least physically possible. Only a lab test can confirm what’s actually inside.
claimed niacin 500 mg100% of serving mass — tiny doses are normal for potent activesserving ≈ 500 mg

The claimed niacin dose of 500 mg fits within the ≈500 mg serving — physically possible. Only a lab test can confirm what’s actually inside.

A low percentage isn’t a red flag — most servings are mostly carrier, binder, and flavoring.

Show the arithmetic
niacin: 500 mg claimed ÷ 500 mg serving mass = 100%. Serving mass source: serving size printed on the packaging (photo-read from listing images). Redo it yourself — that’s the point.

Verifiability profile — 5 of 6 public signals

✓ Per-serving dose established✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found✓ Third-party lab named or registry-certified· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID810014679440 — via source listing UPC
BrandNutricost
Source listing identifierB01IIDB6JE
Retailer listing titleNutricost Niacin (Vitamin B3) 500mg, 240 Capsules, with Flushing, GMO-…
show full title Nutricost Niacin (Vitamin B3) 500mg, 240 Capsules, with Flushing, GMO-Free
USPTO brand ownereSupplements, LLC · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · UTAH, USA
Owner filed addressUTAH, USA) DBA Nutricost; 351 E 1750 N, VINEYARD, UTAH 84059, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 Capsule
Servings per container240
Pack statement240 CAPSULES
Badges printed on packNON-GMO, GLUTEN-FREE, GMP, Third Party Tested, GMP compliant facility, Non-GMO Product

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Niacin (as nicotinic acid)500 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “NON-GMO” · “GMO PRODUCT” · “GLUTEN-FREE PRODUCT” · “THIRD PARTY TESTED” · “QUALITY” · “ASSURED” · “GMP COMPLIANT FACILITY”

Read by a vision model from 5 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$14.94 checked Jul 25, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Brand store nutricost.com: 199 supplement products (+51 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science

No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.

Ingredient science — NIH references

NiacinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Record 810014679440 · built July 25, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai