Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 810029809313 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 11 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD+) | 300 mg | — | |
| Green Tea Leaf 20:1 Extract (98% Polyphenols) | 100 mg | — | |
| Turmeric Root 10:1 Extract | 100 mg | — | |
| Grape Seed 50:1 Extract (95% Proanthocyanidins) | 100 mg | — | |
| Urolithin A | 50 mg | — | |
| Coenzyme Q-10 (Ubiquinone) | 25 mg | — | |
| Apigenin (from Celery Seed Extract) | 25 mg | — | |
| Resveratrol | 25 mg | — | |
| Alpha Lipoic Acid | 25 mg | — | |
| Pterostilbene | 5 mg | — | |
| Astaxanthin | 2 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Written reviews rose from 2 to 123 between December 4 and December 8, 2025. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 121, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
The exact product listing names “Artnaturals,” while the saved package/panel image reads “thinbi.” This can reflect a product line, catalog error, changed listing, or different packaging; it does not prove substitution. Confirm the package identity before applying ownership or other brand-level records to this product.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.
Published sources describe how turmeric / curcumin have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Turmeric, PubMed search: curcumin bioavailability piperine.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 2 on 2025-12-04 to 123 on 2025-12-08 (net +121). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 810029809313.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…THIRD PARTY TESTED…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Origin claim “…Made in the USA with quality-focused manufacturing standards.…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
| Benefit claim “…anti-aging support & dna health…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Turmeric Root 10:1 Extract | shaded = doses used in studies (500 mg–2 g) · bar = this label | 100 mg — below the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 810029809313 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Artnaturals |
| Source listing identifier | B0DM2N7RNF |
| Retailer listing title | NAD Supplement Extra Strength NMN Alternative Liposomal + Green Tea fo… show full titleNAD Supplement Extra Strength NMN Alternative Liposomal + Green Tea for Women & Men w/ Urolithin A, Resveratrol, CoQ10, Alpha Lipoic Acid |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 2 Capsules |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Net weight | 8,457MG |
| Pack statement | 60 CAPSULES |
| Badges printed on pack | MADE IN USA, MADE IN THE USA, THIRD PARTY, TESTED, IN USA, 3RD PARTY TESTED, NON GMO, GLUTEN FREE, VEGAN, THIRD PARTY TESTED IN USA |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD+) | 300 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Green Tea Leaf 20:1 Extract (98% Polyphenols) | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Turmeric Root 10:1 Extract | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Grape Seed 50:1 Extract (95% Proanthocyanidins) | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Urolithin A | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Coenzyme Q-10 (Ubiquinone) | 25 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Apigenin (from Celery Seed Extract) | 25 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Resveratrol | 25 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Alpha Lipoic Acid | 25 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Pterostilbene | 5 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Astaxanthin | 2 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“LIPOSOMAL CAPSULE TECHNOLOGY” · “BOOSTED WITH” · “anti-aging support & dna health” · “additives, fillers, GMO & gluten” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “60 CAPSULES” · “NAD+ is a vital coenzyme found in every cell resposinble for energy, DNA repair, & healthy aging.” · “by the age of 40 your NAD levels decline by: 50% speeding up aging”
Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
We found a brand storefront, but we could not match any price on it to this exact product when we checked.
Brand store artnaturals.com: 94 supplement products — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Niacin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)
Turmeric — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,288) · botanical; rare hepatotoxicity reports
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Related research & consistency
turmeric / curcumin — NIH NCCIH — Turmeric · PubMed search: curcumin bioavailability piperine · WebMD: turmeric · ClinicalTrials.gov — 286 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: plain curcumin absorbs poorly — most positive trials pair it with piperine (black pepper) or a bioavailability-enhanced form.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 810029809313 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai