lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 810029809313 · back to the summary

NAD Supplement Extra Strength NMN Alternative Liposomal + Green Tea for Women & Men w/ U…

2 concrete dimensions confirmed · 3 still open · built September 03, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00810029809313 · checked 2026-07-23

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

11listed rows
11separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 11 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD+)300 mg
Green Tea Leaf 20:1 Extract (98% Polyphenols)100 mg
Turmeric Root 10:1 Extract100 mg
Grape Seed 50:1 Extract (95% Proanthocyanidins)100 mg
Urolithin A50 mg
Coenzyme Q-10 (Ubiquinone)25 mg
Apigenin (from Celery Seed Extract)25 mg
Resveratrol25 mg
Alpha Lipoic Acid25 mg
Pterostilbene5 mg
Astaxanthin2 mg

vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out2

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

The review count moved gradually, not in one burst

Written reviews rose from 2 to 123 between December 4 and December 8, 2025. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 121, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution1

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

Package brand differs from the listing brand

The exact product listing names “Artnaturals,” while the saved package/panel image reads “thinbi.” This can reflect a product line, catalog error, changed listing, or different packaging; it does not prove substitution. Confirm the package identity before applying ownership or other brand-level records to this product.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing6

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how turmeric / curcumin have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Turmeric, PubMed search: curcumin bioavailability piperine.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 2 on 2025-12-04 to 123 on 2025-12-08 (net +121). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

Brand ownership record not saved

This record does not hold an exact, supplement-class public ownership record for the brand. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that the brand has no owner or that the product is improper.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

3

Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?

“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 810029809313.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…THIRD PARTY TESTED…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Origin claim
“…Made in the USA with quality-focused manufacturing standards.…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made
“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
Benefit claim
“…anti-aging support & dna health…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Turmeric Root 10:1 Extract
shaded = doses used in studies (500 mg–2 g) · bar = this label
100 mg — below the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID810029809313 — via source listing UPC
BrandArtnaturals
Source listing identifierB0DM2N7RNF
Retailer listing titleNAD Supplement Extra Strength NMN Alternative Liposomal + Green Tea fo…
show full title NAD Supplement Extra Strength NMN Alternative Liposomal + Green Tea for Women & Men w/ Urolithin A, Resveratrol, CoQ10, Alpha Lipoic Acid

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size2 Capsules
Servings per container30
Net weight8,457MG
Pack statement60 CAPSULES
Badges printed on packMADE IN USA, MADE IN THE USA, THIRD PARTY, TESTED, IN USA, 3RD PARTY TESTED, NON GMO, GLUTEN FREE, VEGAN, THIRD PARTY TESTED IN USA

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide (NAD+)300 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Green Tea Leaf 20:1 Extract (98% Polyphenols)100 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Turmeric Root 10:1 Extract100 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Grape Seed 50:1 Extract (95% Proanthocyanidins)100 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Urolithin A50 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Coenzyme Q-10 (Ubiquinone)25 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Apigenin (from Celery Seed Extract)25 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Resveratrol25 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Alpha Lipoic Acid25 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Pterostilbene5 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Astaxanthin2 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“LIPOSOMAL CAPSULE TECHNOLOGY” · “BOOSTED WITH” · “anti-aging support & dna health” · “additives, fillers, GMO & gluten” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “60 CAPSULES” · “NAD+ is a vital coenzyme found in every cell resposinble for energy, DNA repair, & healthy aging.” · “by the age of 40 your NAD levels decline by: 50% speeding up aging”

Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

We found a brand storefront, but we could not match any price on it to this exact product when we checked.

Brand store artnaturals.com: 94 supplement products — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

NiacinNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)

TurmericNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,288) · botanical; rare hepatotoxicity reports

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

turmeric / curcuminNIH NCCIH — Turmeric · PubMed search: curcumin bioavailability piperine · WebMD: turmeric · ClinicalTrials.gov — 286 registered studies

Use pattern in research: plain curcumin absorbs poorly — most positive trials pair it with piperine (black pepper) or a bioavailability-enhanced form.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 810029809313 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai