Found on the brand's own store
The brand's store lists this exact barcode as “Greens: Peachy Greens Mix (30 Servings)” (variant: 30) — identity confirmed across retailer listings.
Full record · 810093780181 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes 6 separately ingredients with amounts and 2 combined blend totals. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 16 | — | |
| Sodium | 10 mg | — | |
| Total Carbohydrate | 4 g | — | |
| Dietary Fiber | 2 g | — | |
| Total Sugars | 1 g | — | |
| Added Sugars | 0 g | — | |
| Superfood Blend | 6,850 mg | — | |
| Prebiotic Blend | 2,600 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The brand's store lists this exact barcode as “Greens: Peachy Greens Mix (30 Servings)” (variant: 30) — identity confirmed across retailer listings.
USPTO lists Clean Simple Eats, LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in UTAH, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Open Food Facts resolves 810093780181 to "SUPER GREENS MIX PEACHY" (CLEAN SIMPLE EATS) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Technical check only: the panel’s 3 actives sum to 9,450 mg, which fits inside the ≈11,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
30 servings × 11 g = 330 g, matching the printed net weight 330 g (NET WT 11.6 OZ (330g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber, multivitamin / greens blend have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 78 on 2025-06-29 to 99 on 2026-07-20 (net +21). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 810093780181.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…3RD PARTY TESTED” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. The exact brand page names no testing issuer and links no product-bound report. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Benefit claim “…: Each serving of our greens superfood powder delivers a carefully curated mix of nutrient-dense greens and veggies like chlorella, spirulina, kale, spinach, and broccol” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Dietary Fiber | shaded = doses used in studies (3 g–10 g) · bar = this label | 2 g — below the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 810093780181 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Clean Simple Eats |
| Source listing identifier | B0BSNW9LGJ |
| Retailer listing title | Clean Simple Eats Super Greens Powder, Peachy Greens, 30 Servings… show full titleClean Simple Eats Super Greens Powder, Peachy Greens, 30 Servings |
| USPTO brand owner | Clean Simple Eats, LLC · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · UTAH, USA |
| Owner filed address | 13222 S. Tree Sparrow Drive, Suite R-330, Riverton, UTAH 84096, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving Size 11g (1 scoop) |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Net weight | NET WT 11.6 OZ (330g) |
| Pack statement | 30 SERVINGS PER BAG |
| Badges printed on pack | NON GMO, 3RD PARTY TESTED |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 16 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 10 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrate | 4 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Dietary Fiber | 2 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Sugars | 1 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Added Sugars | 0 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Superfood Blend | 6,850 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Prebiotic Blend | 2,600 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“ALL YOUR SUPER FOODS IN JUST 1 SCOOP” · “RESEALABLE ZIPPER!” · “Naturally Flavored with Other Natural Flav” · “GREENS” · “TEAR STRAIGHT ACROSS” · “DID SOMEONE SAY PEACHY RINGS?” · “13 TYPES OF GREENS” · “PLANT-POWERED ENERGY*”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $37.91 checked Aug 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
| Brand store (cleansimpleeats.com) ↗ | $39.99 variant: 30 — matching UPC/GTIN |
Brand store cleansimpleeats.com: 147 supplement products (+2 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Related research & consistency
prebiotic fiber (inulin-type) — NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.
multivitamin / greens blend — NIH ODS — Multivitamin/mineral supplements fact sheet · PubMed search: multivitamin supplementation outcomes · ClinicalTrials.gov — 497 registered studies
ℹ Use pattern in research: research evaluates multivitamins ingredient-by-ingredient — blend-level health claims outrun what blend-level evidence can show.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 810093780181 · built August 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai