“USDA ORGANIC Certified B Corporation GMP CERTIFIED VEGAN NON GMO”
Evidence →“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Exact product checked · GTIN 00810104620291MARYRUTH'S · checked Jul 25, 2026🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · MRO MaryRuth, LLC · Delaware, USA
Quick read · MARYRUTH'S
MARYRUTH'S USDA Organic Multivitamin Gummies
Checked against public sources on July 25, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
60gummies · 30 servings
Does the marketing hold up?
FDA recall appears in this brand's history An exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.
Is the dose real?✓Panel read — 12 ingredients listed
What a serving costs$0.83per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?No testing claim made
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸MRO MaryRuth, LLClimited liability company · Delaware, USA
Is it the real thing?✓Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?Brand history — not this product
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
2◖ partly confirmedno contradictions · brand-level recall on file
Marketing claims, checked
The checks, one by one
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
◐Partly confirmed2
“formulated to give your child the vitamin boost they need. With vitamin A, vitamin C,”
Evidence →Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
Quick read · 4 useful findings
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Needs explanationAny trouble in public records?
FDA recall appears in this brand's history
An exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.
Evidence and sources
Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. MARY RUTH ORGANICS recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2021-10-28: “Internal testing found the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the product.” (status: Terminated). The recalled product was: “MaryRut…
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingChecks outIs the label honest?
Every ingredient shows its amount · 12 ingredients listed.
Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
Evidence and sources
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingChecks outWho is behind it?
The barcode identity checks out · 810104620291.
The barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.
Evidence and sources
Open Food Facts resolves 810104620291 to "Organic Kids Multivitamin Gummies" (MaryRuth's) — consistent with this listing.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingChecks outCan you trust the review pattern?
Reviews grew steadily — about 201 between March 26, 2026 to July 24, 2026, with no sudden spike.
Gradual growth is more ordinary. A sudden burst deserves a closer look.
Evidence and sources
Written reviews grew from 420 to 450 across 2026-04-09 – 2026-07-24 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~15).
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 1
- No matched to this exact product public label filing is saved in this record.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
MRO MaryRuth, LLCLimited Liability Company · exact supplement-class mark for MARYRUTH'S
Filed address
9220 Sunset Blvd., Suite 320, West Hollywood, California 90069, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Research behind the findings
Dose and research context
The label amount is shown beside the ranges used in the linked ingredient studies.
Background reading
What the research says about these amounts
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 2 mg of zinc per serving. Studies we found used 8 mg–40 mg a day, so this sits below that range.
0studied 8 mg–40 mg
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
Where it sells
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$24.95
$0.83 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 25, 2026
View on Amazon ↗Target
Exact UPC/GTIN match$24.95
$0.83 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 25, 2026
View on Target ↗iHerb
Exact UPC/GTIN match$24.95
$0.83 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 25, 2026
View on iHerb ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
Search results remain not linked to this exact product until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 3 sellers at the same price at check time.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want the complete evidence trail?
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Record built July 25, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.