LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
What checks out · MARYRUTH'S

MARYRUTH'S N-Acetyl Cysteine Capsules

USPTO names MRO MaryRuth, LLC as the brand owner.

Rebuilt from public sources on July 22, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.

What this means for you · What checks out

What the record confirms

USPTO lists MRO MaryRuth, LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in Delaware, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells …

Brand-level caution

FDA recall appears in this brand's history

Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. MARY RUTH ORGANICS recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2021-10-28: “Internal testing found the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in …

Specific fact confirmed

UPC independently corroborated

Open Food Facts resolves 810104621168 to "NAC" (Mary Ruth’s) — consistent with this listing.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

0declared rows
0separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 0 declared rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
N-Acetyl-Csyteine

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as declared panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Public ownership record
🇺🇸
MRO MaryRuth, LLCLimited Liability Company · exact mark owner for MARYRUTH'S

9220 Sunset Blvd., Suite 320, West Hollywood, California 90069, UNITED STATES

AssignmentsNo transfers recorded

Filed address
9220 Sunset Blvd., Suite 320, West Hollywood, California 90069, UNITED STATES

This is the USPTO owner of the brand wordmark. It tells a shopper who is behind the brand, but does not by itself identify the manufacturer or prove where this product was made.

Want the complete evidence trail?

The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.

Read / share full evidence →
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check

Confirmed evidence

What checked out02

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists MRO MaryRuth, LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in Delaware, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Barcode confirmed in an outside database

Open Food Facts resolves 810104621168 to "NAC" (Mary Ruth’s) — consistent with this listing.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution00

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing04

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Review-count history: not available

Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.

No data

FDA recall appears in this brand's history

Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. MARY RUTH ORGANICS recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2021-10-28: “Internal testing found the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the product.” (status: Terminated). The recalled product was: “MaryRuth's Organic Infants Liquid Probiotic; Unflavored, a Dietary Supplement. 1 fl. oz. (30 mL) UPC: 8 56645 00858 7 Serving size (five drops - start with one and work up to” — not necessarily the product on this page. Verify at FDA’s recall database.

No data

Panel amounts are awaiting a clearer image read

The current image extraction retained 1 ingredient name(s) but no usable amounts. This is a LookCloser processing gap, not evidence that the brand withheld the numbers; dose arithmetic is withheld until the panel is re-read.

No data

No label filed with NIH's public catalog

The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 810104621168.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

Record built July 22, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.