Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 810108641193 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
We did the comparison: the listing claims 2 g of collagen polypeptide, and the listing-image panel shows 2 g collagen polypeptide serving size: 1 pack. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collagen Polypeptide | 2000 mg | — | |
| Fructooligosaccharides | 750 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
USPTO lists Zhu Lianyong (INDIVIDUAL; OTHER) in CHINA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Open Food Facts resolves 810108641193 to "Collagen Peptides" (OMOGS) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
label claims 2000 mg/serving — below the range commonly used in research (trials use 2.5–15 g/day of hydrolyzed peptides). A lower dose is not necessarily useless — but it is not the amount the research used. Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.
The observed listing and a related brand product page both claim third-party testing. Neither names the laboratory or links a product- or lot-specific report. The related page does not publish this record's UPC. Repeating the claim across two pages confirms the brand publishes it, not that testing occurred. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.
The listing claims 2 g; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Collagen Polypeptide at 2 g per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.
At 1.2 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (2500–15000 mg), this product runs roughly $16 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.
Published sources describe how collagen peptides have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial, WebMD search: collagen.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Why is the collagen peptides amount below the dose used in published research?
There can be good answers — a more bioavailable form, a different intended use. Ask for the reasoning and any data behind it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 810108641193.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…【QUALITY AND SAFETY GUARANTEED 】Collagen Peptide Dietary Supplement is third party tested for purity, gluten free, soy free, and non-GMO.…” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page repeats a testing claim but names no issuer; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur. |
| Benefit claim “OMOGS Collagen Peptides Powder, with Prebiotics & Cranberry Extract -Hydrolyzed Collagen Peptides Support Hair, Skin, Nail, Bone & Digestive Health, Grass Fed, Non-GMO, f” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient evidence exists; on dose: label claims 2000 mg/serving — below the range commonly used in research (trials use 2.5–15 g/day of hydrolyzed peptides). |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Collagen Polypeptide | shaded = doses used in studies (2.5 g–15 g) · bar = this label | 2 g — below the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 810108641193 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | OMOGS |
| Source listing identifier | B0CFTKRPCW |
| Retailer listing title | OMOGS Collagen Peptides Powder, with Prebiotics & Cranberry Extract -H… show full titleOMOGS Collagen Peptides Powder, with Prebiotics & Cranberry Extract -Hydrolyzed Collagen Peptides Support Hair, Skin, Nail, Bone & Digestive Health, Grass Fed, Non-GMO, for Women & Men |
| USPTO brand owner | Zhu Lianyong · INDIVIDUAL; OTHER · CHINA |
| Owner filed address | Mazili Group,Zhouxi Village Committee, Shakou Town,Yingde City, Guangdong Province, 513000, CHINA |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | Serving Size: 1 Pack |
| Servings per container | 30 |
| Net weight | Net weight: 6g/Packet |
| Pack statement | 30 PACKETS |
| Badges printed on pack | NON-GMO, LAB TESTED |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Collagen Polypeptide | 2000 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Fructooligosaccharides | 750 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“Collagen Types I, II, III, V & X” · “Easy To Mix*” · “Healthy Skin & Hair*” · “Joints Support*” · “2000mg Collagen Per Serving” · “750mg Prebiotic Per Serving” · “5TYPES OF FOOD SOURCE COLLAGEN” · “Anti-aging Benefits: Reduces fine lines, improves skin elasticity, helps strengthen and support muscles, bones, joints a”
Read by a vision model from 5 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $12.58 checked Sep 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Official brand domain: omogs.us. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Related research & consistency
collagen peptides — PubMed search: collagen peptide supplementation trial · WebMD search: collagen · ClinicalTrials.gov — 587 registered studies
ℹ Dosage: label claims 2000 mg/serving — below the range commonly used in research (trials use 2.5–15 g/day of hydrolyzed peptides).
ℹ Use pattern in research: daily oral use over 8+ weeks in studies.
These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.
Record 810108641193 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai