“Quality and Safety Guaranteed:Our women's probiotic supplements have GMP certified”
Evidence →“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Exact product checked · GTIN 00810108641247OMOGS · checked Sep 2, 2026 · on sale since Mar 15, 2024🇨🇳 USPTO wordmark owner · Zhu Lianyong · CHINA
Quick read · OMOGS
OMOGS Women's Probiotic 180 Billion CFUs 18…
Checked against public sources between July 25 and September 2, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
90capsules
Does the marketing hold up?
🇨🇳 Brand owner: Zhu Lianyong · individual; other, CHINA. This tells you who is behind the brand and where the trademark record points. It does not by itself identify the manufacturer.
Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified1 ingredient listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costsNo price found for this exact barcode
Is it tested?Claimed — no lab or certificate found
Who’s behind it?🇨🇳Zhu Lianyongindividual; other · CHINA
Is it the real thing?✓Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?Recall check not run yeta gap in our records, not a finding about the product
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
1◖ partly confirmed1? couldn’t verifyno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Total Probiotic Activity | 180 Billion CFUs |
|---|
Printed on the package: NON GMO · GLUTEN FREE · NON SOY · DAIRY FREE · VEGAN · PREMIUM · GMP · MANUFACTURING PRAC
We read 1 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
Marketing claims, checked
The checks, one by one
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
◐Partly confirmed1
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
?Couldn’t verify independently1
“guarantee quality, purity and potency, so you can use it with”
Evidence →No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page repeats a testing claim but names no issuer; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Quick read · 1 useful finding
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
CheckedCan you trust the review pattern?
Reviews rose from 211 to 359 between November 3, 2025 and August 17, 2026 — no sudden jump.
A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Evidence and sources
Written reviews rose from 211 to 359 between November 3, 2025 and August 17, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 30, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 3
- Panel amounts still need a clearer source image.
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
- Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇨🇳
Zhu LianyongIndividual; Other · exact supplement-class mark for OMOGS
Filed address
Mazili Group,Zhouxi Village Committee, Shakou Town,Yingde City, Guangdong Province, 513000, CHINA
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Research behind the findings
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Where it sells
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$9.98
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 2, 2026
View on Amazon ↗Brand website
Official product-page candidate · UPC absent$19.99
Official shopping lead; excluded from exact price comparisons.
OMOGS Women's Probiotic 180 Billion CFUs 18 Strains, with Organic Prebiotics, Cranberry Extract, D-Mannose & Digestive Enzymes, for Digestive, Boost Immune, PH Balance & Urethral Health, 90 Capsules · Default Title. Confirm the package UPC/GTIN before buying.
Check brand website ↗iHerb
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.
The brand-page price is shown as a shopping lead only. It is excluded from the exact-product price difference because the page does not publish this record's matching UPC/GTIN.
The observed listing and related brand page repeat 90 capsules, 2 capsules. That confirms cross-page consistency of the published claim, not the product contents.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want the complete evidence trail?
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.