lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 810110790056 · back to the summary

Dr. Berg Maximum Strength 7-in-1 Vitamin D3 K2 5000 IU | Naturally Derived D3 | 4X Lab-T…

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built July 26, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00810110790056 · checked 2026-07-26

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The named ingredient is not separately quantified

MARKETING0.05 mg — listing title
PANELPanel read — named ingredient amount not separately listed
named amount open

The panel was read, but it does not give a separate amount for vitamin k2. The listing claim cannot be compared to a named panel row.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Vitamin D (as cholecalciferol)125 mcg (5000 IU)
Vitamin K (as menaquinone-7)50 mcg
Vitamin B6 (as pyridoxal-5-phosphate)1.7 mg
Magnesium (as magnesium citrate)12.5 mg
Zinc (as zinc sulfate)10 mg
Medium-chain triglycerides powder5 mg
Ox bile powder2.5 mg

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out3

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists The Health & Wellness Center Inc. (CORPORATION) in VIRGINIA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Barcode confirmed in an outside database

UPCitemdb resolves 810110790056 to "Dr. Berg D3 & K2 Vitamin Supplement - D3 K2 5000 IU 60 Capsules" (Dr. Berg) — consistent with this listing.

Confirmed

The review count moved gradually, not in one burst

Written reviews rose from 1,619 to 1,918 between February 19 and July 24, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 80, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing8

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named

The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.

No data

The headline amount is not tied to a panel row for the same ingredient

The listing presents 0 mg for vitamin k2, but vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 does not contain a same-name quantified row. The saved image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.

No data

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how magnesium, zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.

No data

FDA recall appears in this brand's history

This recall is not about the product on this page. Health & Wellness Center, Inc. recalled a different product on September 24, 2021. FDA has since closed that case. The recalled item was “Dr. Berg Nutritionals, Liquid Vitamin D with Zinc Dietary Supplement ( Liquid Vitamin D ), Individual 1 FL OZ bottle (with no secondary packaging), Glass bottle. The label of t”. FDA recorded the reason as “Product recalled because of the presence of mold and/or yeast found in amounts that exceed the product's established specifications ”. Verify at FDA’s recall database.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 1,590 on 2026-02-05 to 1,918 on 2026-07-24 (net +328). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

3

Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?

An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 810110790056.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…in D3 K2 5000 IU | Naturally Derived D3 | 4X Lab-Tested & Verified | High Absorption Formula | K2 D3…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Professional-endorsement claim
“…R IMMUNITY WITH GLOBALLY SOURCED INGREDIENTS Doctor Formulated Lab Tested 7-in-1 Support GMO-Free NO JUNK N…”
Marketing credential
We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers
A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed.
Speed-of-results claim
“…e unhappy with this product, reach out to us within 30 days of your purchase date and we will take care…”
No evidence located
We looked for: a study measuring the stated outcome over the stated time
We found no study of this product measuring the stated outcome over the stated timeframe.
Benefit claim
“…bsorption. MCT powder, a healthy fat source, enhances the bioavailability of vitamin D with K2, al…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Magnesium (as magnesium citrate)
shaded = doses used in studies (200 mg–420 mg) · bar = this label
12.5 mg — below the studied range
Zinc (as zinc sulfate)
shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label
10 mg — within the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID810110790056 — via source listing UPC
BrandDr. Berg Nutritionals
Source listing identifierB0B4BG1WDM
Retailer listing titleDr. Berg Maximum Strength 7-in-1 Vitamin D3 K2 5000 IU | Naturally Der…
show full title Dr. Berg Maximum Strength 7-in-1 Vitamin D3 K2 5000 IU | Naturally Derived D3 | 4X Lab-Tested & Verified | High Absorption Formula | K2 D3 Vitamin Supplement | 60 Capsules
USPTO brand ownerThe Health & Wellness Center Inc. · CORPORATION · VIRGINIA, USA
Owner filed address912 Drew St. Suite 203-13, Clearwater, Florida 33755, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 capsule
Servings per container60
Pack statement60 Capsules
Badges printed on packNON GMO, NON-GMO, USA, WITH GLOBALLY SOURCED INGREDIENTS

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Vitamin D (as cholecalciferol)125 mcg (5000 IU) High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin K (as menaquinone-7)50 mcg High
clearly legible in the photo
Vitamin B6 (as pyridoxal-5-phosphate)1.7 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Magnesium (as magnesium citrate)12.5 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Zinc (as zinc sulfate)10 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Medium-chain triglycerides powder5 mg High
clearly legible in the photo
Ox bile powder2.5 mg High
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“NATURALLY DERIVED D3” · “4X TESTED” · “SUPPORT FOR IMMUNITY” · “WITH GLOBALLY SOURCED INGREDIENTS” · “Doctor Formulated” · “Lab Tested” · “7-in-1 Support” · “GMO-Free”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$17.99 checked Jul 26, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin DNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)

Vitamin KNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,124) · no UL established; interacts with warfarin

Vitamin B6NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,372) · UL 100 mg (adults; chronic high intake linked to neuropathy)

MagnesiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,814) · UL 350 mg (SUPPLEMENTAL magnesium only (not from food))

ZincNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

magnesiumNIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet · PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation · WebMD: magnesium · ClinicalTrials.gov — 3,206 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold.

zincNIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 810110790056 · built July 26, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai