lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 810110790902 · back to the summary

Dr. Berg Black Elderberry Capsules (Advanced Immune Support*) with 15,000 IU Vitamin D

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built August 02, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00810110790902 · checked 2026-07-31

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The 1 g black elderberry (sambucus nigra) fruit powder claim matches the panel

MARKETING1 g — listing title
PANELBlack elderberry (Sambucus nigra) fruit powder 1 g — same amountBlack elderberry (Sambucus nigra) fruit powder 1 g
matches panel

We did the comparison: the listing claims 1 g of black elderberry (sambucus nigra) fruit powder, and the listing-image panel shows 1 g black elderberry (sambucus nigra) fruit powder serving size 3 capsules. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Vitamin D (as cholecalciferol)375 mcg
Zinc (as zinc picolinate)60 mg
Black elderberry (Sambucus nigra) fruit powder1000 mg
Camu camu (Myrciaria dubia) fruit powder90 mg

vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out2

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists The Health & Wellness Center Inc. (CORPORATION) in VIRGINIA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing7

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Review-count history: not available

Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.

No data

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.

No data

FDA recall appears in this brand's history

This recall is not about the product on this page. Health & Wellness Center, Inc. recalled a different product on September 24, 2021. FDA has since closed that case. The recalled item was “Dr. Berg Nutritionals, Liquid Vitamin D with Zinc Dietary Supplement ( Liquid Vitamin D ), Individual 1 FL OZ bottle (with no secondary packaging), Glass bottle. The label of t”. FDA recorded the reason as “Product recalled because of the presence of mold and/or yeast found in amounts that exceed the product's established specifications ”. Verify at FDA’s recall database.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

Barcode record is too sparse to confirm identity

Open Food Facts resolves 810110790902 to "1000 Mg Elderberry" (Dr. Berg), but that record lacks enough exact brand/product detail to confirm or contradict this listing.

No data

Package and trademark records name different responsible entitie

The package says distributed by: Dr. Eric Berg DC. USPTO names The Health & Wellness Center Inc. as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the saved records do not establish the relationship.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Answered by the panel: 1 g of the 1 g headline is elderberry. Which independent lab can confirm that amount in this product?

The panel resolves the front-label arithmetic. The remaining question is lot-specific contents and stability; published category testing gives context, not a test of this product.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

3

Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?

“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 810110790902.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Manufacturing claim
“…GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE…”
Partly supported
We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Origin claim
“…MADE IN THE USA…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made
“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
Benefit claim
“…Berg Black Elderberry Capsules (Advanced Immune Support*) with 15,000 IU Vitamin D, 60 mg of Zinc, & 90 mg of Camu Camu - (4-in-1) Sambucus Elderberry Immune Support Sup”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Zinc (as zinc picolinate)
shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label
60 mg — above the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID810110790902 — via source listing UPC
BrandDr. Berg Nutritionals
Source listing identifierB0DFCZC1L8
Retailer listing titleDr. Berg Black Elderberry Capsules (Advanced Immune Support*) with 15,…
show full title Dr. Berg Black Elderberry Capsules (Advanced Immune Support*) with 15,000 IU Vitamin D, 60 mg of Zinc, & 90 mg of Camu Camu - (4-in-1) Sambucus Elderberry Immune Support Supplement - 90 Capsules
USPTO brand ownerThe Health & Wellness Center Inc. · CORPORATION · VIRGINIA, USA
Owner filed address912 Drew St. Suite 203-13, Clearwater, Florida 33755, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving sizeServing size 3 capsules
Servings per container30
Pack statement90 Capsules
Badges printed on packPACKAGED IN THE USA WITH GLOBALLY SOURCE, MADE IN THE USA, DR. BERG APPROVED, MADE IN USA, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE, cGMP CERTIFIED, PROUDLY MADE IN USA

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Vitamin D (as cholecalciferol)375 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Zinc (as zinc picolinate)60 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Black elderberry (Sambucus nigra) fruit powder1000 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Camu camu (Myrciaria dubia) fruit powder90 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“4 IN 1 IMMUNE SUPPORT” · “POWERFUL ANTIOXIDANT FORMULA” · “THE KNOWLEDGE DOC” · “15,000 IU VITAMIN D3” · “60 mg ZINC” · “1000 mg ELDERBERRY” · “SAME TRUSTED FORMULA, FRESH NEW LOOK!” · “ADVANCED IMMUNE SUPPORT”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$28.99 checked Aug 02, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin DNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)

ZincNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

zincNIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 810110790902 · built August 02, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai