USPTO names The Health & Wellness Center Inc. as the brand owner.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 22, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
USPTO lists The Health & Wellness Center Inc. (CORPORATION) in VIRGINIA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sell…
Brand-level caution
Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. Health & Wellness Center, Inc. recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2021-09-24: “Product recalled because of the presence of mold and/…
We did the comparison: the listing claims 500 mg of potassium, and the listing-image panel shows 500 mg potassium 2 capsules. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin B6 | 2 mg 118% | — | |
| Magnesium | 40 mg 10% | — | |
| Potassium | 500 mg 11% | — | |
| Taurine | 100 mg * | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a declared “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; any remaining comparison concerns the front-label framing.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as declared panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
The panel declares 0.5 g per serving, in the 200–420 mg/day context cited in the research.
912 Drew St. Suite 203-13, Clearwater, Florida 33755, UNITED STATES
Filed address
912 Drew St. Suite 203-13, Clearwater, Florida 33755, UNITED STATES
This is the USPTO owner of the brand wordmark. It tells a shopper who is behind the brand, but does not by itself identify the manufacturer or prove where this product was made.
These links provide the public research context used alongside the captured panel. They do not establish safety, effectiveness, or product quality.
Can the testing claim be tied to a named laboratory and this product lot? Evidence that would settle it: lot-specific COA naming the laboratory and matching the product lot.
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
USPTO lists The Health & Wellness Center Inc. (CORPORATION) in VIRGINIA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.
The listing claims third-party testing without naming any lab or certifier, so the claim can't be verified as stated.
The listing claims 500 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Potassium at 500 mg per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.
Published sources describe how magnesium have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.
Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. Health & Wellness Center, Inc. recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2021-09-24: “Product recalled because of the presence of mold and/or yeast found in amounts that exceed the product's established specifications .” (status: Terminated). The recalled product was: “Dr. Berg Nutritionals, Liquid Vitamin D with Zinc Dietary Supplement ( Liquid Vitamin D ), Individual 1 FL OZ bottle (with no secondary packaging), Glass bottle. The label of t” — not necessarily the product on this page. Verify at FDA’s recall database.
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?
An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 810110791428.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 22, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.