Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full record · 810125970481 · back to the summary
Liquid I.V. Hydration Electrolytes, Variety Pack
Exact product checkedGTIN 00810125970481 · checked 2026-07-25
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
9listed rows
9separately quantified
0combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 9 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D | 0 mcg | — | |
| Calcium | 0 mg | — | |
| Iron | 0 mg | — | |
| Potassium | 380 mg | — | |
| Vitamin C | 62 mg | — | |
| Niacin | 19.3 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B6 | 1.93 mg | — | |
| Vitamin B12 | 5.79 mcg | — | |
| Pantothenic Acid | 9.6 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out3
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists The LIV Group, Inc. (CORPORATION) in DELAWARE, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
Reviews accumulated gradually
Written reviews grew from 735 to 739 across 2026-05-02 – 2026-05-14 with no single manufactured spike (largest 30-day gain ~4).
Documented concerns
What needs caution0
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing5
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Photo-read pack numbers need confirmation
Our image read produced 4 × 16 g = 64 g versus net weight 256 g. OCR or variant mixing can cause this; check the physical package before treating it as a contradiction.
Listed amounts fit the serving
Technical check only: the panel’s 9 actives sum to 473 mg, which fits inside the ≈16,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
Public label filing not saved
This record does not currently hold an matched to this exact product public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 735 on 2026-05-02 to 739 on 2026-05-14 (net +4). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
UPC valid, no independent record
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Which specific study supports this claim — and was it run on this exact formula?
Ask for the citation, how many people took part, the dose used, and whether the study tested this product or just one ingredient in it. Ingredient research is not product evidence.
2
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 810125970481.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical-evidence claim “…with an optimized ratio of electrolytes and clinically tested nutrients. EXTRAORDINARY HYDRATION: Hydratio…” | No evidence located We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula | We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 810125970481 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Liquid I.V. |
| Source listing identifier | B0CG7W485N |
| Retailer listing title | Liquid I.V. Hydration Electrolytes, Variety Pack, 16 Count… show full titleLiquid I.V. Hydration Electrolytes, Variety Pack, 16 Count |
| USPTO brand owner | The LIV Group, Inc. · CORPORATION · DELAWARE, USA |
| Owner filed address | 127 Nevada Street, El Segundo, CALIFORNIA 90245, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 stick |
| Servings per container | 4 |
| Net weight | NET WT. 9.03oz (256g) |
| Pack statement | 16-0.56 oz (16g) STICKS |
| Badges printed on pack | VEGAN, SOY FREE, DAIRY FREE, CERTIFIED GLUTEN FREE, OSMOLab CERTIFIED, NON GMO Project VERIFIED |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D | 0 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Calcium | 0 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Iron | 0 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Potassium | 380 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin C | 62 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Niacin | 19.3 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B6 | 1.93 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Vitamin B12 | 5.79 mcg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Pantothenic Acid | 9.6 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“FASTER HYDRATION” · “THAN WATER ALONE” · “SCIENTIFICALLY FORMULATED” · “8 VITAMINS & NUTRIENTS” · “extraordinary hydration” · “We believe a healthier world starts with equitable access to clean water.” · “We partner with leading organizations to advance innovative water solutions.” · “Since 2015, we have donated over 55M servings of Liquid I.V.”
Read by a vision model from 5 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $27.99 checked Jul 25, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Official brand domain: www.liquid-iv.com. This storefront does not expose a complete public catalog count.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Vitamin D — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)
Calcium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))
Iron — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (28,479) · UL 45 mg (adults, from all sources)
Potassium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC
Vitamin C — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (11,019) · UL 2000 mg (total intake, adults)
Niacin — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,689) · UL 35 mg (supplemental/added niacin, adults)
Vitamin B6 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (2,372) · UL 100 mg (adults; chronic high intake linked to neuropathy)
Vitamin B12 — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (5,006) · no UL established
Pantothenic Acid — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (601) · no UL established
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Record 810125970481 · built July 25, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai