Checked against public sources between July 21 and July 24, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
A lot of reviews for how new this brand is. 631 ratings, at a typical 1–2% review rate, implies roughly 31,550–63,100 units sold since the brand's first claimed use in an unstated date. Worth weighing whether that pace is plausible for a new, unknown…
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
| Calories | 45 |
|---|---|
| Total Carbohydrate | 12 g |
| Total Sugars | 6 g |
| Includes 5g Added Sugars | 10 %* |
| Sodium | 5 mg |
| Creatine Monohydrate | 5 g |
| AstraGin® (Panax notoginseng Extract (root) and Astragalus membranaceus Extract (root)) | 25 mg |
Printed on the package: NSF · CERTIFIED SPORT · NSF CERTIFIED SPORT · GMP
We read 7 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
1 promise needs a closer look.
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
We found no named, citable study of this product or formula. The claim may rest on ingredient research rather than a trial of this product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
Moist, acidic formats can reduce the active ingredient over time, so the delivered amount may be lower than the label says.
Creatine is stable as dry powder, while published stability research shows faster degradation as moisture and temperature rise. A gummy's delivered amount therefore depends on formulation and shelf-life testing; this record does not test this product.
The sales implied by the review count are worth weighing against how new or little-known the brand is. This is a plausibility question, not a fake-review verdict.
631 ratings, at a typical 1–2% review rate, implies roughly 31,550–63,100 units sold since the brand's first claimed use in an unstated date. Worth weighing whether that pace is plausible for a new, unknown label. The count is a documented fact; the conclusion is yours.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThe public ownership record is ambiguous. We show the exact candidates instead of choosing one by name similarity.
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: Hungry Fish Media, LLC, Force Factor Brands LLC. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingEvery ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingA count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Written reviews rose from 92 to 335 between December 4, 2025 and August 24, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 40, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
DELAWARE, USA · Registration 3786044
24 School Street, Suite 301, Boston, MASSACHUSETTS 021085139, UNITED STATES
IC 005: Vitamin and mineral supplements; Vitamin supplements.
Delaware, USA · Registration 8142487
332 Congress Street, Suite 200, Boston, Massachusetts 02210, UNITED STATES
IC 032: Energy drinks; Sports drinks containing electrolytes; Powders for making energy drinks.; IC 005: Dietary and nutritional supplements.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product. Open USPTO source ↗
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.
The panel lists 5 g of creatine monohydrate per serving. Studies we found used 3 g–5 g a day, so this sits inside that range.
Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.
$1.00 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 1, 2026
View on Amazon ↗$1.00 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 24, 2026
View on iHerb ↗Official shopping lead; excluded from exact price comparisons.
Creatine Monohydrate · 100 Servings / Blue Raspberry. Confirm the package UPC/GTIN before buying.
Check brand website ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 2 sellers at the same price at check time.
The brand-page price is shown as a shopping lead only. It is excluded from the exact-product price difference because the page does not publish this record's matching UPC/GTIN.
The observed listing and related brand page repeat 5 g. That confirms cross-page consistency of the published claim, not the product contents.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.