Checked against public sources between July 25 and July 28, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
How it’s marketed doesn’t match how it was studied. The listing uses “pre-workout” framing, but published research attributes creatine monohydrate’s effect to studied as a daily supplement — the effect comes from muscle saturation over weeks, not from timing a…
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
| Creatine Monohydrate | 5g |
|---|
Printed on the package: 100% MICRONIZED · THIRD PARTY TESTED · NON GMO · GLUTEN FREE · VEGAN FRIENDLY · 100% MICRO
We read 1 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
The barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.
Open Food Facts resolves 810137461571 to "creatine monohydrate" (Bloom) — consistent with this listing.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingA count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Written reviews rose from 110 to 322 between July 29, 2025 and August 29, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 67, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Filed address
PO Box 552, Orient, NEW YORK 11957, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
$0.49 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Aug 29, 2026
View on Amazon ↗$0.50 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 28, 2026
View on iHerb ↗$0.52 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 28, 2026
View on Target ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 3 sellers. Amazon was lowest at $19.74; Target was highest at $20.99 — a $1.25 range at check time.
No official brand storefront is confirmed in this record. That is neutral, but it prevents a direct brand-price, label, review, and document check.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.