Checked against public sources between July 23 and July 24, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
8 ingredients’ amounts are hidden inside “Organic Greens Blend”. The label gives one combined figure of 5500mg for Organic Fiber Blend, Organic Super Fruits Blend, Probiotics Blend and 5 more, and no amount for any of them individually. …
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
| Calories | 30 |
|---|---|
| Total Carbohydrate | 6g |
| Dietary Fiber | 3g |
| Protein | 3g |
| Sodium | 20mg |
| Organic Greens Blend | 5500mg |
| Organic Fiber Blend | 3500mg |
| Organic Super Fruits Blend | 1000mg |
| Probiotics Blend | 60mg |
| Lactobacillus acidophilus | 6 Billion CFU |
| Bifidobacterium longum | 1 Billion CFU |
| Lactobacillus rhamnosus | 1 Billion CFU |
| Lactococcus lactis | 1 Billion CFU |
| Lactobacillus plantarum | 1 Billion CFU |
Printed on the package: CCOF Certified Organic · USDA ORGANIC · CCOF · VEGETARIAN PRODUCT · GLUTEN-FREE PRODUCT · NON-GMO PRODUCT · QUALITY ASSURED · THIRD PARTY TESTED
We read 14 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
The barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.
Open Food Facts resolves 810139571353 to "Organic Super Greens" (Nutricost) — consistent with this listing.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingA count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
Written reviews rose from 16 to 29 between August 13, 2025 and August 26, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 4, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Filed address
UTAH, USA) DBA Nutricost; 351 E 1750 N, VINEYARD, UTAH 84059, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
$0.73 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Aug 29, 2026
View on Amazon ↗$0.80 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 24, 2026
View on iHerb ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 2 sellers. Amazon was lowest at $21.95; iHerb was highest at $23.95 — a $2.00 range at check time.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.