“COMPLIANT GMP”
Evidence →“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Exact product checked · GTIN 00810139571629Nutricost · checked Aug 31, 2026 · on sale since Oct 9, 2014🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · eSupplements, LLC · UTAH, USAPackage says manufactured for: nutricost · 351 E 1750 N, Vineyard, UT 84059
Quick read · Nutricost
Nutricost Creatine Monohydrate Powder
Checked against public sources between July 24 and August 31, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
17servings per container
Does the marketing hold up?
Package and trademark records name different responsible entities. The package says manufactured for: nutricost, 351 E 1750 N, Vineyard, UT 84059. USPTO names eSupplements, LLC as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing…
Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified1 ingredient listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costs$0.21per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?Claimed — no lab or certificate found
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸eSupplements, LLClimited liability company · UTAH, USA
Is it the real thing?✓Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?✓No recalls found
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
1◖ partly confirmed1? couldn’t verifyno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself
What the Supplement Facts panel says
| Creatine Monohydrate (micronized) | 5g |
|---|
Printed on the package: QUALITY nutricost GUARANTEED · VEGAN PRODUCT · VEGETARIAN PRODUCT · NON-GMO GMO PRODUCT · GLUTEN-FREE PRODUCT · GMP COMPLIANT GMP FACILITY · THIRD PARTY TESTED · Vegan
We read 1 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.
Marketing claims, checked
The checks, one by one
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
◐Partly confirmed1
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
?Couldn’t verify independently1
“PARTY”
Evidence →No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. The exact brand page names no testing issuer and links no product-bound report. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
Quick read · 1 useful finding
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
CheckedWho is behind it?
The barcode identity checks out · 810139571629.
The barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.
Evidence and sources
The brand's store lists this exact barcode as “Nutricost Creatine Monohydrate Powder” (variant: Unflavored / 500 G) — identity confirmed across retailer listings.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 3
- No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
- Panel amounts still need a clearer source image.
- We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
eSupplements, LLCLimited Liability Company · exact supplement-class mark for NUTRICOST
Filed address
UTAH, USA) DBA Nutricost; 351 E 1750 N, VINEYARD, UTAH 84059, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Research behind the findings
Dose and research context
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
Where it sells
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$21.50
$0.21 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 1, 2026
View on Amazon ↗Brand website
Exact UPC/GTIN match$23.97
$0.24 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Aug 31, 2026
View on Brand website ↗iHerb
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search iHerb ↗Target
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Target ↗Walmart
Not confirmedNo exact listing saved
We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 2 sellers. Amazon was lowest at $21.50; Brand website was highest at $23.97 — a $2.47 range at check time.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Review pages
Does the brand page tell the same story?
Brand page 1,738 reviews · retailer 58,789 ratingsinspect
The published counts do not line up. The brand page publishes 1,738; the retailer surface shows 58,789. Different systems can collect different review pools, so this is a signal to inspect, not proof that reviews were manipulated.
The brand page did not expose a complete star-by-star breakdown in the captured structured data, so LookCloser cannot test whether lower-star reviews were omitted. Source: exact barcode-bound brand product page · retailer surface · counts do not prove authenticity.
Want to inspect the evidence?
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.