lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 810142230391 · back to the summary

Double Wood Supplements Ashwagandha KSM 66 Organic and Clinically Studied Extract (600mg…

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built July 21, 2026

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Every check we ran

Intake method matches the research

Nothing in this listing contradicts how these ingredients were studied (ashwagandha). For example, ashwagandha: daily use over 6–12 weeks in studies; extract concentration matters (root powder ≠ standardized extract). Sources: NIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha, PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial.

Each ingredient’s amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Double Wood LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in PENNSYLVANIA, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

No data yet: Label math could not be verified

What this means: the listing doesn't publish net weight, per-serving dose, so the dose claim can't be checked against physics from public data. That's neither a pass nor a strike — but it does mean you're taking the label on faith. Checkable products publish these numbers.

i

Not found in NIH's DSLD label registry

The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.

i

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

i

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 55 on 2026-02-01 to 60 on 2026-03-27 (net +5). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Clinical-evidence claim
“…d Supplements Ashwagandha KSM 66 Organic and Clinically Studied Extract (600mg Per Serving, 120 Capsules, 60…”
No evidence located
We looked for: a named, citable clinical study of this product or formula
No named, citable study of this product or formula was located in public sources. The claim may rest on ingredient-level research rather than a trial of this product.
Quality-testing claim
“…ity Manufactured in the USA From Globally So Third-Party Tested”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: a named laboratory, a certificate of analysis, or a certification-registry entry
No named laboratory, no certificate of analysis, and no certification-registry entry matching this product was located.
Manufacturing claim
“…ion Powerful Adaptogen premium full-spectrum GMP GMP CERTIFIED Facility Manufactured in the U…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim
Facility-level claims can be accurate and still say nothing about this product’s contents. No registration document was located.
Origin claim
“…ium full-spectrum GMP GMP CERTIFIED Facility Manufactured in the USA From Globally So Third-Party Tested”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made
“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
Benefit claim
“…d as adaptogenic herbs traditionally used to support the body’s natural response to occasional st…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
KSM-66 ASHWAGANDHA
shaded = doses used in studies (250 mg–600 mg) · bar = this label
600 mg — within the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID810142230391
BrandDouble Wood Supplements
Source listing identifierB0F4T4X2Y5
Retailer listing titleDouble Wood Supplements Ashwagandha KSM 66 Organic and Clinically Stud…
show full title Double Wood Supplements Ashwagandha KSM 66 Organic and Clinically Studied Extract (600mg Per Serving, 120 Capsules, 60 Servings) Adaptogen Cortisol Manager for Women and Men

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size600 mg per serving
Servings per container60
Pack statement120 Capsules
Badges printed on packGMP, GMP CERTIFIED Facility, Manufactured in the USA From Globally So, Third-Party Tested

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
KSM-66 ASHWAGANDHA600 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
BACOPA EXTRACT450 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“Clinically Studied Organic Ashwagandha Extract” · “Daily Value not established” · “Featuring Award Winning” · “ROOTED IN WELLNESS” · “Promotes a Good Night's Rest” · “Supports a More Positive Mood” · “Enhances Cognitive Function” · “Powerful Adaptogen”

Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Ingredient science — NIH references

AshwagandhaNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (204) · botanical; liver-injury case reports exist

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the declared amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

ashwagandhaNIH NCCIH — Ashwagandha · PubMed search: ashwagandha randomized trial · WebMD: ashwagandha · ClinicalTrials.gov — 78 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily use over 6–12 weeks in studies; extract concentration matters (root powder ≠ standardized extract).

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 810142230391 · built July 21, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai