LookCloser record · 811839032540 · methodology v0.1
Global Healing Center Organic Mushroom Blend Powder
Rebuilt from public sources on July 21, 2026.
Result
MODERATE public verifiability
Caution — unverified claims Ingredient amounts are hidden inside a blend. Evidence availability only; this does not establish safety or effectiveness.
3 of 6 public trust signals found · 1 product-specific concern · $2.04 per serving
The short read
This product lists a "Organic Freeze-Dried Raw Mushroom Blend" totaling 6.75g per serving. While this blend contains multiple mushrooms, the exact amount of each individual mushroom isn't specified. The product's serving size appears to align with typical supplement use. You can verify the ingredient amounts by comparing the Supplement Facts panel on the product bottle to the one shown in the listing images.
Why this result?
We ran this product through public-record checks — label math, barcode registries, FDA recall lists, published lab tests. This banner sums up what those checks could and couldn’t confirm. Green means nothing public contradicted the label — not proof it works or is safe. Gray means the data to check simply isn’t public: a gap, not a verdict. We show the evidence; the conclusion is yours.
Confirmed evidence
What checked out01
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
✓
Taken the way the research studied it
Nothing in this listing contradicts how these ingredients were studied (prebiotic fiber, multivitamin / greens blend). For example, prebiotic fiber: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.
Confirmed
Documented concerns
What needs caution01
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
!
Ingredient amounts hidden in a blend
The panel lists “Organic Freeze-Dried Raw Mushroom Blend” as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.
Caution
Unresolved public record
What is still missing05
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
…
Listed amounts fit the serving
Technical check only: the panel’s 3 actives sum to 6,750 mg, which fits inside the ≈6,750 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
No data
…
Photo-read pack math is internally consistent
22 servings × 6.75 g = 148.5 g, matching the printed net weight 150 g (NET WT. 5.3 oz (0.33 lb / 150g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
No data
…
No label filed with NIH's public catalog
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
No data
…
UPC valid, no independent record
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
No data
…
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 32 on 2026-06-02 to 32 on 2026-06-02 (net +0). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
No data
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
2
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
3
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 811839032540.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
The full report is free no signup · no paywall
Every check, claim, label read, dose comparison, registry search, source, and date. Free to read, download, and share.
Supplements are repeat purchases. Formulas get reformulated, lots get recalled, brands finally publish the lab report they were asked for. We can watch this record and email you only if something changes.
Your address is used for this one purpose. No newsletter, no marketing, no third parties, no tracking pixels — and every email carries a one-click unsubscribe that needs no login. We store the address, the record, and the date. Nothing else.
Record built July 21, 2026. Sources: source listing (live fetch) · brand's own storefront · published independent assays (NOW Foods 2024, SuppCo 2025; brand-level) · PubMed · openFDA · Open Food Facts · NIH DSLD · LookCloser ingredient KB. Evidence-tiered statements of documented fact; conclusions belong to the reader. Beta: this report isn’t yet independently archived — treat it as a well-sourced starting point, not a certificate. Evidence-based corrections welcome.