Testing claim names a recognized certifier
A named certifier/laboratory appears in the listing (registry cross-check pending).
Full record · 813349011367 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 2 listed rows. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myo-Inositol | 2000 mg | — | |
| D-Chiro-Inositol | 50 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-2.5-flash Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
A named certifier/laboratory appears in the listing (registry cross-check pending).
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
The brand's store lists this exact barcode as “Ovasitol® Inositol Powder Supplement” (variant: Canister) — identity confirmed across retailer listings.
Open Food Facts resolves 813349011367 to "Ovasitol" (Theralogix) — consistent with this listing.
Written reviews rose from 197 to 368 between August 2, 2025 and August 25, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 26, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, unit count, per-serving dose, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.
180 servings × 2.22 g = 399.6 g, matching the printed net weight 400 g (NET WEIGHT 400 g (14.12 oz.)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
Theralogix, LLC appears in NSF’s certified-products registry with 10 certified product(s), but we couldn’t confirm this exact listing is among them. Closest listed product: “Ovasitol® Inositol Supplement (Canada)”. Certification covers contents and contaminants — not effectiveness.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 196 on 2025-07-30 to 368 on 2026-08-25 (net +172). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 813349011367.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Look the product up yourself in NSF’s certified-products registry.
Search “Theralogix, LLC” at info.nsf.org — certification covers contents and contaminants, not effectiveness.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Quality-testing claim “…Third-Party Tested…” | Partly supported We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, the NSF/ANSI 173 certified-products registry, any linked COA or test report; IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried | A testing body is named on the listing, but we found no lot-specific certificate of analysis. |
| Manufacturing claim “…GMP Certified…” | Partly supported We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim | “GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check. |
| Origin claim “…Manufactured in USA” | Claimed, not verifiable We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made | “Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product. |
| Benefit claim “Theralogix Ovasitol Inositol Powder - 90-Day Supply - Myo-Inositol & D-Chiro Inositol for Hormone Balance & Ovarian Function Support* - NSF Certified - 400 g (180 Serving” | Not checked yet We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 813349011367 |
| Brand | Theralogix |
| Source listing identifier | B0CT6LK1JS |
| Retailer listing title | Theralogix Ovasitol Inositol Powder - 90-Day Supply - Myo-Inositol & D… show full titleTheralogix Ovasitol Inositol Powder - 90-Day Supply - Myo-Inositol & D-Chiro Inositol for Hormone Balance & Ovarian Function Support* - NSF Certified - 400 g (180 Servings) |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 1 Leveled Scoop (2.22 g) |
| Servings per container | 180 |
| Net weight | NET WEIGHT 400 g (14.12 oz.) |
| Badges printed on pack | NSF, VEGAN, GLUTEN FREE, NO ARTIFICIAL DYES, DYE FREE, GMP Certified, CONTENTS CERTIFIED, 40:1 INOSITOL BLEND, CONTENTS CERTIFIED NSF, Manufactured in USA |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Myo-Inositol | 2000 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| D-Chiro-Inositol | 50 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“40:1 INOSITOL BLEND” · “In the body's naturally occurring ratio of 40:1” · “Ideal 40:1 Ratio” · “This research-backed dose is more effective than other inositol ratios or taking myo- or d-chiro-inositol alone.” · “Healthy hormone levels*” · “Regular menstrual cycles*” · “Ovarian health*” · “Fertility health*”
Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Brand store (theralogix.com) ↗ | $122.00 variant: Canister — matching UPC/GTIN |
Brand store theralogix.com: 52 supplement products — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science
No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.
Record 813349011367 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai