The review count moved gradually, not in one burst
Written reviews rose from 21 to 43 between September 24, 2025 and August 11, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 5, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Full record · 814722024707 · back to the summary

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Written reviews rose from 21 to 43 between September 24, 2025 and August 11, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 5, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.
Documented concerns
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, unit count, per-serving dose, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: Muscle Feast, LLC, Sean Gillespie. These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 20 on 2025-08-10 to 43 on 2026-08-11 (net +23). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
What to ask and check
Ask the brand or seller
Can you send a clear photo of the full Supplement Facts panel?
It’s the one part of the label required to state what’s inside and how much. A seller who won’t show it before purchase is asking for trust the label would have earned.
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 814722024707.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 814722024707 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Muscle Feast |
| Source listing identifier | B0DFQHHBBW |
| Retailer listing title | Muscle Feast Creapure Micronized Creatine Monohydrate Powder, Unflavor… show full titleMuscle Feast Creapure Micronized Creatine Monohydrate Powder, Unflavored |
| USPTO brand-owner record | Muscle Feast, LLC · Ohio, USA · registration not stated · Ohio, USA) Muscle Feast; 1320 Boston Rd., Nashport, Ohio 43830, UNITED STATES |
| USPTO brand-owner record | Sean Gillespie · USA; OHIO, USA · registration 5485726 · 1320 Boston Rd., Nashport, OHIO 43830, UNITED STATES |
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $37.90 checked Sep 03, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Brand store www.musclefeast.com: 10 supplement products (+2 merch items) — a single-category catalog.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — creatine monohydrate · Grade A
Record 814722024707 · built September 03, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai