Full record · 819354000488 · back to the summary
Greens First Original Greens Powder, Strawberry Kiwi
3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built July 26, 2026

Exact product checkedGTIN 00819354000488 · checked 2026-07-26
Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.
How to read this report
What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.
What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.
What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.
Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
25listed rows
22separately quantified
3combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes 22 separately ingredients with amounts and 3 combined blend totals. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|
| Calories | 40 | — | |
| Total Fat | 0.5 g | — | |
| Total Carbohydrate | 7 g | — | |
| Dietary Fiber | 3 g | — | |
| Total Sugars | <1 g | — | |
| Protein | 2 g | — | |
| Folate (as (6S)-5-Methyltetrahydrofolic Acid Glucosamine Salt) (Quatrefolic®) | 425 mcg DFE | — | |
| Calcium | 35 mg | — | |
| Iron | 2.44 mg | — | |
| Sodium | 20 mg | — | |
| Organic Barley Grass Powder | 1.5 g | — | |
| Nutrim® Oat Bran Powder | 1.5 g | — | |
| Organic Vegetable Blend | 1.5 g | — | |
| Sunflower Lecithin Powder | 750 mg | — | |
| Organic Chlorella Cracked Cell Wall Powder | 500 mg | — | |
| Organic Spirulina Powder | 500 mg | — | |
| Organic Horseradish Tree Leaf Powder (Moringa) | 500 mg | — | |
| Brown Rice Bran Powder | 300 mg | — | |
| Enzyme Blend Complex | 200 mg | — | |
| Prebiotic and Probiotic Blend | 200 mg | — | |
| Actinidia deliciosa Fruit Powder (Kiwi) | 200 mg | — | |
| Green Tea Leaf Extract | 120 mg | — | |
| Apple Fruit Powder | 100 mg | — | |
| Organic Cabbage Palm Fruit Powder | 100 mg | — | |
| Organic Lycium Fruit Powder | 100 mg | — | |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a listed “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those listed amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Every check we ran
Confirmed evidence
What checked out1
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
✓
Exact trademark owner identified
USPTO lists Doctors for Nutrition, Inc. (CORPORATION; LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in CALIFORNIA, USA; DELAWARE, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.
ConfirmedDocumented concerns
What needs caution1
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
!
Ingredient amounts hidden in a blend
The panel lists “Organic Vegetable Blend” as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.
CautionUnresolved public record
What is still missing9
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
…
Listed amounts fit the serving
Technical check only: the panel’s 18 actives sum to 8,108 mg, which fits inside the ≈9,870 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
No data…
Photo-read pack math is internally consistent
60 servings × 9.87 g = 592.2 g, matching the printed net weight 592.2 g (NET WT 20.89 oz. (592.2 g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
No data…
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.
No data…
Public label filing not saved
We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.
No data…
No recall found — which is not the same as being tested
This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.
No data…
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
No data…
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 0 on 2026-02-20 to 0 on 2026-02-20 (net +0). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
No data…
Package and trademark records name different responsible entitie
The package says distributed by: THE HEALTH FIRST COMPANY. USPTO names Doctors for Nutrition, Inc. as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the saved records do not establish the relationship.
No data…
UPC valid, no independent record
Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.
No dataWhat to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
2
Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?
An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.
3
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 819354000488.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
What the listing promises — claim by claim
Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
| Claim | Status | What we found |
|---|
| Professional-endorsement claim “…TASTE ENERGY DIGESTION IMMUNITY LONGEVITY #1 DOCTOR RECOMMENDED BEST TASTING Organic fruits and veggies Pre…” | Marketing credential We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers | A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed. |
| Benefit claim “…our body and optimize your health Gut Health Support with Prebiotics and Probiotics: Greens First…” | Partly supported We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research | Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed. |
“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
This label vs. the doses studied
Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
| Ingredient | Where this label sits | Reading |
|---|
| Dietary Fiber | shaded = doses used in studies (3 g–10 g) · bar = this label | 3 g — within the studied range |
Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.
Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals
✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published
What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.
Identity
| UPC (barcode) — also our record ID | 819354000488 — via source listing UPC |
| Brand | Greens First |
| Source listing identifier | B0GH935DQ8 |
| USPTO brand owner | Doctors for Nutrition, Inc. · CORPORATION; LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · CALIFORNIA, USA; DELAWARE, USA |
| Owner filed address | 415 South Granados Ave., Solana Beach, CALIFORNIA 92075, UNITED STATES |
From the label (photo-read)
| Serving size | 9.87 g (Approx. 1 Scoop) |
| Servings per container | 60 |
| Net weight | NET WT 20.89 oz. (592.2 g) |
| Badges printed on pack | VEGAN, GLUTEN FREE, DAIRY FREE, CAFFEINE FREE, NO ADDED SUGAR |
Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):
| Ingredient | Amount per serving | Reading confidence |
|---|
| Calories | 40 | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Fat | 0.5 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Carbohydrate | 7 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Dietary Fiber | 3 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Total Sugars | <1 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Protein | 2 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Folate (as (6S)-5-Methyltetrahydrofolic Acid Glucosamine Sal | 425 mcg DFE | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Calcium | 35 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Iron | 2.44 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sodium | 20 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Organic Barley Grass Powder | 1.5 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Nutrim® Oat Bran Powder | 1.5 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Organic Vegetable Blend | 1.5 g | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Sunflower Lecithin Powder | 750 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Organic Chlorella Cracked Cell Wall Powder | 500 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Organic Spirulina Powder | 500 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Organic Horseradish Tree Leaf Powder (Moringa) | 500 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Brown Rice Bran Powder | 300 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Enzyme Blend Complex | 200 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Prebiotic and Probiotic Blend | 200 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Actinidia deliciosa Fruit Powder (Kiwi) | 200 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Green Tea Leaf Extract | 120 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Apple Fruit Powder | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Organic Cabbage Palm Fruit Powder | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
| Organic Lycium Fruit Powder | 100 mg | High clearly legible in the photo |
Claims printed on the packaging:
“25 YEARS OF GREAT TASTE” · “ENERGY” · “DIGESTION” · “IMMUNITY” · “LONGEVITY” · “#1 DOCTOR RECOMMENDED” · “BEST TASTING” · “Organic fruits and veggies”
Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.
Where it sells
| Seller | Price |
|---|
| Retailer listing ↗ | $93.98 checked Jul 26, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending |
Brand store greensfirst.com: 23 supplement products (+5 merch items) — a single-category catalog.
Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.
Ingredient science — NIH references
Folate — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (10,628) · UL 1000 mcg (synthetic folic acid from supplements/fortified food)
Calcium — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))
Iron — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (28,479) · UL 45 mg (adults, from all sources)
Probiotic — NIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (25,361) · strain-specific; label CFU at-manufacture vs at-expiry differ
Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.
Record 819354000488 · built July 26, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai