lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 819354001379 · back to the summary

Greens First Original Greens Powder, Chocolate

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built August 07, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00819354001379 · checked 2026-08-06

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

25listed rows
22separately quantified
3combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes 22 separately ingredients with amounts and 3 combined blend totals. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories40
Total Fat1 g
Total Carbohydrate6 g
Dietary Fiber2 g
Total Sugars<1 g
Protein3 g
Folate (as (6S)-5-Methyltetrahydrofolic Acid Glucosamine Salt) (Quatrefolic®)425 mcg DFE
Iron2.17 mg
Sodium10 mg
Potassium150 mg
Organic Chocolate Bean Powder Processed with Alkali4.3 g
Nutrim® Oat Bran Powder750 mg
Sunflower Lecithin Powder750 mg
Brown Rice Bran Powder300 mg
Organic Spirulina Powder200 mg
Organic Horseradish Tree Leaf Powder (Moringa)100 mg
Milk Thistle Seed Extract75 mg
Organic Acerola Fruit Powder75 mg
Organic Vegetable Blend750 mg
Enzyme Blend Complex200 mg
Prebiotic and Probiotic Blend200 mg
Actinidia deliciosa Fruit Powder (Kiwi)200 mg
Green Tea Leaf Extract120 mg
Apple Fruit Powder100 mg
Organic Cabbage Palm Fruit Powder10 mg

vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out1

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Doctors for Nutrition, Inc. (CORPORATION; LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in CALIFORNIA, USA; DELAWARE, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution1

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

Ingredient amounts are hidden inside “Organic Vegetable Blend”

The panel lists “Organic Vegetable Blend” (750 mg) as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing9

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Listed amounts fit the serving

Technical check only: the panel’s 18 actives sum to 8,283 mg, which fits inside the ≈9,970 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.

No data

Photo-read pack math is internally consistent

30 servings × 9.97 g = 299.1 g, matching the printed net weight 299.1 g (NET WT 10.55 oz. (299.1 g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 80 on 2025-08-05 to 81 on 2026-08-01 (net +1). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

Barcode record is too sparse to confirm identity

Open Food Facts resolves 819354001379 to "Powder for drink" (brand not supplied), but that record lacks enough exact brand/product detail to confirm or contradict this listing.

No data

Package and trademark records name different responsible entitie

The package says manufactured for: First Health FL LLC, 990 S. Rogers Circle, Suite 3, Boca Raton, FL 33487. USPTO names Doctors for Nutrition, Inc. as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the saved records do not establish the relationship.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

2

Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?

An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.

3

What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?

A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 819354001379.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Professional-endorsement claim
“…#1 DOCTOR RECOMMENDED…”
Marketing credential
We looked for: who the professionals are, whether they were compensated, and what the endorsement covers
A professional endorsement is a marketing credential, not clinical evidence. Public sources don’t establish who was consulted, whether they were paid, or what specifically they reviewed.
Benefit claim
“…Gut Health Support with Prebiotics & Probiotics: This formula includes prebiotics, probiotics, and digestive enzymes to help maintain healthy digestion and balance your ”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Dietary Fiber
shaded = doses used in studies (3 g–10 g) · bar = this label
2 g — below the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID819354001379 — via source listing UPC
BrandGreens First
Source listing identifierB01MR3JMS3
Retailer listing titleGreens First Original Greens Powder, Chocolate, 30 Servings…
show full title Greens First Original Greens Powder, Chocolate, 30 Servings
USPTO brand ownerDoctors for Nutrition, Inc. · CORPORATION; LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · CALIFORNIA, USA; DELAWARE, USA
Owner filed address415 South Granados Ave., Solana Beach, CALIFORNIA 92075, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size9.97 g (Approx. 1 Scoop)
Servings per container30
Net weightNET WT 10.55 oz. (299.1 g)
Pack statement30 SERVINGS
Badges printed on packVegan, Gluten Free, Dairy Free, Caffeine Free, No Added Sugar, VEGAN, GLUTEN FREE, DAIRY FREE

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories40 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Fat1 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate6 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Dietary Fiber2 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total Sugars<1 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Protein3 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Folate (as (6S)-5-Methyltetrahydrofolic Acid Glucosamine Sal425 mcg DFEHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Iron2.17 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium10 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Potassium150 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Organic Chocolate Bean Powder Processed with Alkali4.3 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Nutrim® Oat Bran Powder750 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Sunflower Lecithin Powder750 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Brown Rice Bran Powder300 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Organic Spirulina Powder200 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Organic Horseradish Tree Leaf Powder (Moringa)100 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Milk Thistle Seed Extract75 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Organic Acerola Fruit Powder75 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Organic Vegetable Blend750 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Enzyme Blend Complex200 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Prebiotic and Probiotic Blend200 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Actinidia deliciosa Fruit Powder (Kiwi)200 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Green Tea Leaf Extract120 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Apple Fruit Powder100 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Organic Cabbage Palm Fruit Powder10 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“THE ORIGINAL” · “ENERGY · DIGESTION · IMMUNITY · LONGEVITY” · “49 SUPERFOODS” · “#1 DOCTOR RECOMMENDED” · “BEST TASTING” · “THE HEALTH FIRST COMPANY” · “CHOCOLATE” · “30 SERVINGS”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$54.95 checked Aug 07, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Brand store greensfirst.com: 23 supplement products (+5 merch items) — a single-category catalog.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

FolateNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (10,628) · UL 1000 mcg (synthetic folic acid from supplements/fortified food)

IronNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (28,479) · UL 45 mg (adults, from all sources)

PotassiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC

ProbioticNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (25,361) · strain-specific; label CFU at-manufacture vs at-expiry differ

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

prebiotic fiber (inulin-type)NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 819354001379 · built August 07, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai