Ingredient amounts are hidden inside a blend
A blend total may be legal, but it prevents you from knowing whether any individual ingredient reaches a meaningful amount.
Exact product checked · GTIN 829835937004Amazing Grass · observed 2026-07-23
The useful read · Amazing Grass
Amazing Grass Super Greens Powder
Ingredient amounts are hidden inside a blend
Rebuilt from public sources on July 23, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
The barcode identity checks out · 829835937004.
The outside identifier points to this product, so the other checks are less likely to be about a look-alike.
Registered in NIH's supplement label database (DSLD)
A government label filing makes the declared formula easier to inspect and compare over time.
Where it sells
Prices found, with identity limits shown
Candidate brand page ↗Same brand and product wording · barcode not publishednot price-compared$16.99
A likely brand product page was found, but neither page publishes a matching UPC/GTIN. Its price is shown as a lead, not as proof of savings for the exact product.
Walmart and iHerb require an exact UPC/GTIN match before their price, panel, or reviews can be attached. Product-name results are treated only as leads, never as this product. No affiliate links; LookCloser earns nothing from these sellers.
Shopper scorecard
The useful findings, in decision order.
Only product facts and comparisons earn a card. Pipeline gaps stay collapsed.
Is the label honest?
Who is behind it?
Checks outBarcode / GTIN record
The barcode identity checks out · 829835937004.
Open Food Facts resolves 829835937004 to "Green superfood" (Amazing Grass) — consistent with this listing.
Why it mattersThe outside identifier points to this product, so the other checks are less likely to be about a look-alike.
Open the source-linked findingChecks outNIH label catalog
Registered in NIH's supplement label database (DSLD)
Label #21183 “Green SuperFood Berry Flavor Drink Powder” (Amazing Grass), entered 2013-05-24, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. NIH marks this label as off-market (superseded or discontinued version). Company on file: Distributor — Amazing Grass, San F…
Why it mattersA government label filing makes the declared formula easier to inspect and compare over time.
Open the source-linked findingWill it do what you want?
Public contextNIH / published research
Research links are available for prebiotic fiber.
Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized tr…
Why it mattersUse the linked research to check whether the ingredient and outcome you care about are actually connected. Ingredient evidence does not verify this product.
Open the source-linked findingRelevant research · quick links
Read the ingredient evidence directly
These links provide the public research context used alongside the captured panel. They do not establish safety, effectiveness, or product quality.
Want the complete evidence trail?
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check
Confirmed evidence
What checked out02
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Full label filed with NIH — ingredients on public record
Label #21183 “Green SuperFood Berry Flavor Drink Powder” (Amazing Grass), entered 2013-05-24, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. NIH marks this label as off-market (superseded or discontinued version). Company on file: Distributor — Amazing Grass, San Francisco, CA.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
Open Food Facts resolves 829835937004 to "Green superfood" (Amazing Grass) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
What needs caution01
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing05
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Listed amounts fit the serving
Technical check only: the panel’s 11 actives sum to 6,672 mg, which fits inside the ≈8,000 mg serving. This means the numbers are physically possible — it does not mean the formula was validated or the contents confirmed.
Photo-read pack math is internally consistent
30 servings × 8 g = 240 g, matching the printed net weight 240 g (NET WT 8.5 OZ (240 G)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.
Research context is available for the listed ingredients
Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 918 on 2026-01-28 to 925 on 2026-07-14 (net +7). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 829835937004.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 23, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.