lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 840093113764 · back to the summary

Nature's Truth Turmeric and Ginger Gummies | 70 Count | Peach Flavor

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built July 26, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00840093113764 · checked 2026-07-26

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The 450 mg turmeric extract (curcuma longa) (root) (a 3:1 extract, equivalent to 1,350 mg of turmeric root) claim matches the panel

MARKETING450 mg — listing title
PANELTurmeric Extract (Curcuma longa) (root) (a 3:1 extract, equivalent to 1,350 mg of Turmeric Root) 450 mg — same amountTurmeric Extract (Curcuma longa) (root) (a 3:1 extract, equivalent to 1,350 mg of Turmeric Root) 450 mg
matches panel

We did the comparison: the listing claims 450 mg of turmeric extract (curcuma longa) (root) (a 3:1 extract, equivalent to 1,350 mg of turmeric root), and the listing-image panel shows 450 mg turmeric extract (curcuma longa) (root) (a 3:1 extract, equivalent to 1,350 mg of turmeric root) 3 vegan gummies. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Turmeric Extract (Curcuma longa) (root) (a 3:1 extract, equivalent to 1,350 mg of Turmeric Root)450 mg
Ginger Extract (Zingiber officinale) (root) (a 10:1 extract, equivalent to 750 mg of Ginger Root)75 mg
Mass check · assumptions shown
0.45 g listed contents = 0.45 g major actives + 0 g carbohydrate
Assume 4 pectin gummies × 2.5–3.5 g each = 10–14 g serving. That leaves roughly 0–2 g for water, pectin, sweetener, acid, and flavor. Serving weight is not printed, so this is a warning, not a closed impossibility.

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out3

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Princeton Research, LLC (LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY) in NEW YORK, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Barcode confirmed in an outside database

Open Food Facts resolves 840093113764 to "" (Nature's Truth) — consistent with this listing.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution1

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

Listed contents barely fit the format’s physics

Listed contents total at least 0.45 g per 4-gummy serving: 0.45 g of major actives plus 0 g carbohydrate. A typical pectin gummy is assumed here to weigh 2.5–3.5 g, making a 4-gummy serving roughly 10–14 g. The panel does not state serving weight, so this remains a warning: the listed contents barely fit the format’s physics. The 2.5–3.5 g gummy assumption is not a measurement.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing7

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math

The saved listing evidence does not establish net weight, per-serving dose, servings per container, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how turmeric / curcumin have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Turmeric, PubMed search: curcumin bioavailability piperine.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 2 on 2026-07-14 to 2 on 2026-07-14 (net +0). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

Package and trademark records name different responsible entitie

The package says distributed by: Nature's Truth LLC, Bohemia, NY 11716 USA. USPTO names Princeton Research, LLC as the exact wordmark owner. That can be a normal distributor, manufacturer, or licensing relationship; the saved records do not establish the relationship.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Answered by the panel: 0.45 g of the 0.45 g headline is turmeric. Which independent lab can confirm that amount in this product?

The panel resolves the front-label arithmetic. The remaining question is lot-specific contents and stability; published category testing gives context, not a test of this product.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 840093113764.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Manufacturing claim
“…on-GMO Gluten Free Dairy Free Soy Free Vegan GMP CERTIFIED COMPANY FDA REGISTERED FACILITY PA…”
Partly supported
We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Turmeric Extract (Curcuma longa) (root) (a 3
shaded = doses used in studies (500 mg–2 g) · bar = this label
450 mg — below the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID840093113764 — via source listing UPC
BrandNature's Truth
Source listing identifierB07Y5KZLZG
USPTO brand ownerPrinceton Research, LLC · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY · NEW YORK, USA
Owner filed addressc/o Jaspan Schlesinger LLP, 300 Garden City Plaza, Garden City, NEW YORK 11530, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size3 Vegan Gummies
Servings per container23
Pack statement70 GUMMIES
Badges printed on packNon-GMO, Gluten Free, Dairy Free, Soy Free, Vegan, GMP CERTIFIED COMPANY, FDA REGISTERED FACILITY, PACKAGED IN THE U.S.A.

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Turmeric Extract (Curcuma longa) (root) (a 3:1 extract, equi450 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Ginger Extract (Zingiber officinale) (root) (a 10:1 extract,75 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“JUST PEACHY!” · “Delicious Peach Flavor” · “NON-GMO” · “GLUTEN FREE” · “VEGAN” · “Daily Value not established.” · “Percent Daily Values are based on a 2,000 calorie diet.” · “NON-GMO · GLUTEN FREE · VEGAN”

Read by a vision model from 7 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$10.29 checked Jul 26, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Brand store naturestruth.com: 242 supplement products (+8 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

TurmericNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (1,288) · botanical; rare hepatotoxicity reports

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

turmeric / curcuminNIH NCCIH — Turmeric · PubMed search: curcumin bioavailability piperine · WebMD: turmeric · ClinicalTrials.gov — 286 registered studies

Use pattern in research: plain curcumin absorbs poorly — most positive trials pair it with piperine (black pepper) or a bioavailability-enhanced form.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 840093113764 · built July 26, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai