LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · GTIN 00840160200403OLLY · checked Sep 2, 2026 · on sale since Apr 14, 2021🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · OLLY PBC · DELAWARE, USAPackage says distributed by: OLLY Publig · San Francisco, CA 94111
Quick read · OLLY

Olly Hello Happy

Checked against public sources between July 26 and September 2, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.

60gummies · 30 servings

Does the marketing hold up?

The label says 4 g of vitamin d in 4 gummies — but not what those 4 gummies weigh. That weight is the one number that would let anyone check the amount on the front. We did not weigh it ourselves, so this is an open question, not a problem we found.

Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified7 ingredients listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costs$0.57per serving, at the checked price
Is it tested?NSF seal printed on the labelwe read it off the package photo; not confirmed in NSF’s registry
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸OLLY PBCcorporation · DELAWARE, USA
Is it the real thing?Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?No recalls found

“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.

1✓ checked outno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself

What the Supplement Facts panel says

Serving size 2 Gummies · 30 servings per container

Calories20
Total Carbohydrate4 g
Total Sugars3 g
Includes Added Sugars3 g
Vitamin D50 mcg
Vitamin D(2000 IU)
Saffron Extract (flower)30 mg

Printed on the package: NSF Certified · Certified B Corporation · NSF · Gluten-free · The OLLY Feel-Good Project · PLASTIC BOTTLE · CONTENTS CERTIFIED · Certified

We read 7 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.

Marketing claims, checked

The checks, one by one

1 promise checks out against the label or linked source.

Matches the label1

“Vitamin D 0 mg per serving”

The label promises 0 mg per serving. The panel says 0 mg. They match.

Evidence →
Quick read · 4 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

Needs explanationIs the label honest?

The label says 4 g of vitamin d in 4 gummies — but not what those 4 gummies weigh

That weight is the one number that would let anyone check the amount on the front. We did not weigh it ourselves, so this is an open question, not a problem we found.

Evidence and sources

A serving is 4 gummies, and the panel lists 4,000 mg — 4 g — of vitamin d in that serving. What the panel doesn’t give is the one number needed to check it: what a serving weighs. Gummies of this type usually run somewhere around 2.5 to 3.5 grams each, which would put 4 of…

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
Needs explanationIs the label honest?

The label shows a visible consistency problem

Check this exact wording or duplicate row on the package before relying on the printed amount.

Evidence and sources

The label visibly shows: “Vitamin D appears more than once”. This is a specific printing or product-image inconsistency worth checking on the package.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
CheckedIs the label honest?

Listing claim matches the Supplement Facts panel

The label promise and the Supplement Facts amount agree.

Evidence and sources

The listing claims 0.05 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Vitamin D at 0.05 mg per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
CheckedWho is behind it?

The barcode identity checks out · 840160200403.

The barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.

Evidence and sources

The brand's store lists this exact barcode as “Hello Happy” (variant: 30 Servings) — identity confirmed across retailer listings.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
What remains open 2
  • No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
  • We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
OLLY PBCCorporation · exact supplement-class mark for OLLY
Registration4783519
Registered2015-07-28
AssignmentsNo transfers recorded

Filed address
86 Graham Street, Suite 200, San Francisco, California 94129, UNITED STATES

USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗

Where it sells

Price check for this exact product

Amazon

Exact UPC/GTIN match
$16.97

$0.57 per labeled serving

matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 2, 2026

View on Amazon ↗

Brand website

Exact UPC/GTIN match
$19.99

4.2/5 · 491 ratings

$0.67 per labeled serving

matching UPC/GTIN · checked Sep 2, 2026

View on Brand website ↗

iHerb

Exact UPC/GTIN match
$19.99

4.6/5 · 115 ratings

$0.67 per labeled serving

matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 26, 2026

View on iHerb ↗

Walmart

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Walmart ↗

Same UPC/GTIN observed across 3 sellers. Amazon was lowest at $16.97; iHerb was highest at $19.99 — a $3.02 range at check time.

Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.

Want to inspect the evidence?

The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.

Read / share full evidence →

Record built September 03, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.