Listing claim matches the label panel
The listing claims 3 mg; the NIH DSLD label registry shows Melatonin at 3 mg per serving — an independently filed label agrees.
LookCloser record · 840160201738 · methodology v0.1
OLLY Sleep Gummies for Adults, 3 mg Melatonin Gummies with L-Theanine
Result
HIGH public verifiability
This product can't be verified from public data Neither good nor bad — the checks below show what this listing publishes and what it withholds. Verifiable products publish more. Evidence availability only; this does not establish safety or effectiveness.
5 of 6 public trust signals found · 0 product-specific concerns
The short read
This supplement is documented to contain 3 mg of Melatonin per serving, which aligns with the amount used in many sleep studies. While this dosage is within common research ranges, the research does not necessarily guarantee the same benefits for everyone. Currently, there is no information checked on the authenticity of this specific product based on marketplace patterns. You can verify that the "Supplement Facts" panel on the product bottle lists Melatonin at 3 mg per serving.
Why this result?
We ran this product through public-record checks — label math, barcode registries, FDA recall lists, published lab tests. This banner sums up what those checks could and couldn’t confirm. Green means nothing public contradicted the label — not proof it works or is safe. Gray means the data to check simply isn’t public: a gap, not a verdict. We show the evidence; the conclusion is yours.
Confirmed evidence
What checked out06
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Melatonin dose matches the amounts used in studies
label claims 3 mg/serving — within the range commonly used in research (sleep trials commonly use 0.5–5 mg; higher doses are not shown to work better and gummy products have repeatedly been found to differ from their labels). Sources: NIH NCCIH — Melatonin, PubMed search: melatonin dose sleep onset.
Taken the way the research studied it
Nothing in this listing contradicts how these ingredients were studied (melatonin). For example, melatonin: taken before bed; timing matters more than size of dose in the research. Sources: NIH NCCIH — Melatonin, PubMed search: melatonin dose sleep onset.
Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Full label filed with NIH — ingredients on public record
Label #180866 “Restful Sleep Blackberry Zen” (OLLY), entered 2018-09-21, with the full Supplement Facts on file — see the panel below. NIH marks this label as off-market (superseded or discontinued version). Company on file: Distributor — OLLY Public Benefit Corp., San Francisco, CA.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
Open Food Facts resolves 840160201738 to "Sleep" (Olly) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
What needs caution00
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing02
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Certified by NSF — contents and contaminants checked
OLLY, Public Benefit Corporation appears in NSF’s certified-products registry with 10 certified product(s), but we couldn’t confirm this exact listing is among them. Closest listed product: “PRECISE PROBIOTICS WITH STRESS SUPPORT”. Certification covers contents and contaminants — not effectiveness.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 185 on 2026-01-22 to 247 on 2026-07-17 (net +62). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 840160201738.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
2
Look the product up yourself in NSF’s certified-products registry.
Search “OLLY, Public Benefit Corporation” at info.nsf.org — certification covers contents and contaminants, not effectiveness.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
The full report is free no signup · no paywall
Every check, claim, label read, dose comparison, registry search, source, and date. Free to read, download, and share.
Want to know if this changes?
Supplements are repeat purchases. Formulas get reformulated, lots get recalled, brands finally publish the lab report they were asked for. We can watch this record and email you only if something changes.
Your address is used for this one purpose. No newsletter, no marketing, no third parties, no tracking pixels — and every email carries a one-click unsubscribe that needs no login. We store the address, the record, and the date. Nothing else.
Record built July 21, 2026. Sources: source listing (live fetch) · brand's own storefront · published independent assays (NOW Foods 2024, SuppCo 2025; brand-level) · PubMed · openFDA · Open Food Facts · NIH DSLD · LookCloser ingredient KB. Evidence-tiered statements of documented fact; conclusions belong to the reader. Beta: this report isn’t yet independently archived — treat it as a well-sourced starting point, not a certificate. Evidence-based corrections welcome.