LookCloser.aipublic supplement evidence
Exact product checked · GTIN 00848970032825ANDREW LESSMAN · checked Aug 16, 2026 · on sale since Jul 6, 2024🇺🇸 USPTO wordmark owner · Winning Combination, The · NEVADA, USA
Quick read · ANDREW LESSMAN

ANDREW LESSMAN ProCaps Vitamin D3 10

Checked against public sources on August 16, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.

180capsules

Does the marketing hold up?

The headline amount is not tied to a panel row for the same ingredient. You are being sold on an ingredient the verified panel does not separately declare. The brand should explain the mismatch.

Is the dose real?Panel read — dose not verified3 ingredients listed; no advertised amount we could confirm against them
What a serving costsNo price found for this exact barcode
Is it tested?No testing claim made
Who’s behind it?🇺🇸Winning Combination, Thecorporation · NEVADA, USA
Is it the real thing?Barcode matches outside records
Trouble on record?No recalls found

“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.

1◖ partly confirmedno contradictions · no recalls
The label itself

What the Supplement Facts panel says

Serving size 1 Capsule

Vitamin D3 (as cholecalciferol)250 mcg (10,000 IU)
Calcium (as calcium carbonate)80 mg
Magnesium (as magnesium oxide)40 mg

We read 3 lines from the package photograph. It is our transcript of the label, not the manufacturer’s panel, and it may be incomplete.

Marketing claims, checked

The checks, one by one

The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.

Partly confirmed1

“capsule provides 200 mg of pure L-Theanine to support a calm, attentive state while helping you remain focused and alert throughout the”

Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

Evidence →

Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.

Quick read · 2 useful findings

What is worth knowing.

Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.

Public contextIs the label honest?

The headline amount is not tied to a panel row for the same ingredient

You are being sold on an ingredient the verified panel does not separately declare. The brand should explain the mismatch.

Evidence and sources

The listing presents 200 mg for l-theanine, but vision:claude-cli:subscription does not contain a same-name quantified row. The saved image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
CheckedIs the label honest?

Every ingredient shows its amount · 3 ingredients listed.

Every ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.

Evidence and sources

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked finding
What remains open 3
  • No FDA recall matched this brand in the current search.
  • We have not found a public label filing for this exact product.
  • Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.

These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.

Who owns the brand wordmark?
🇺🇸
Winning Combination, TheCorporation · exact supplement-class mark for ANDREW LESSMAN
Registration2522398
Registered2001-12-25
AssignmentsYes

Filed address
430 Parkson Road, Henderson, NEVADA 89016, UNITED STATES

USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗

Research behind the findings

Dose and research context

We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.

Background reading

What the research says about these amounts

Not a score. Studies disagree with each other and change over time, so this sits beside the evidence rather than counting toward it — it is here so you can read the sources yourself.

The panel lists 40 mg of magnesium per serving. Studies we found used 200 mg–420 mg a day, so this sits below that range.

0studied 200 mg–420 mg

Study ranges differ between trials and change as research changes. This is background reading, not a pass, a failure, or a recommendation.

Where it sells

Price check for this exact product

Amazon

Exact UPC/GTIN match
$29.90

matching UPC/GTIN · checked Aug 16, 2026

View on Amazon ↗

iHerb

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search iHerb ↗

Target

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Target ↗

Walmart

Not confirmed
No exact listing saved

We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.

Search Walmart ↗

Only one exact price was available at build time; prices change by date, seller, and promotion.

No official brand storefront is confirmed in this record. That is neutral, but it prevents a direct brand-price, label, review, and document check.

Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.

Want the complete evidence trail?

The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.

Read / share full evidence →

Record built August 16, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.