lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 848998082222 · back to the summary

Zahler Junior D3 Vitamins 1000 IU - Chewable Vitamin D3 for Kids to Support Bone

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built July 26, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00848998082222 · checked 2026-07-26

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

What the label discloses

1listed rows
1separately quantified
0combined blend totals

The listing-image panel publishes an amount for each of its 1 listed row. That supports ingredient-by-ingredient review; it does not verify the contents.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Vitamin D3 (as Cholecalciferol) (1000 IU)25 mcg 125%

vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out2

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Advanced Nutrition by Zahler (CORPORATION) in NEW YORK, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

The review count moved gradually, not in one burst

Written reviews rose from 38 to 39 between May 15 and June 12, 2026. The largest rise inside any single 30-day window was about 1, so the count moved in steps rather than in one burst.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing6

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Multi-ingredient formula — panel read, serving weight unknown

We read the full Supplement Facts panel from the listing-image panel (below), but the label doesn’t state a serving weight, so the arithmetic can’t run. A gap in the label’s information, not evidence of a problem.

No data

Public label filing not saved

This record does not currently hold an matched to this exact product public label filing for the exact product. That is a LookCloser coverage gap, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 38 on 2026-05-15 to 39 on 2026-06-12 (net +1). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

UPC valid, no independent record

Check digit passes; no third-party database record found yet. Coverage gaps are common — not a strike.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

2

Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?

“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 848998082222.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Manufacturing claim
“…3 Chewables For Kids In Our State Of The Art Gmp Certified Facility Each Chewable Is Certifie…”
Partly supported
We looked for: the facility registration or certificate behind the claim
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Origin claim
“…Kids Immunity To Protect From Outside Germs Made In The Usa - Zahler Makes Vitamin D3 Chewables For Kids…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: customs records or label filings showing where ingredients were sourced and where it was made
“Made in USA” can describe only final bottling. Ingredient-sourcing records were not located for this product.
Benefit claim
“…ns 1000 IU - Chewable Vitamin D3 for Kids to Support Bone, Teeth & Immune Health - Kosher Orange…”
Not checked yet
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Ingredient-level evidence for this formula isn’t in our knowledge base yet. Recorded as not checked yet — not as a negative.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

Verifiability profile — 3 of 6 public signals

✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Per-serving dose established — not published· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID848998082222 — via source listing UPC
BrandZahler
Source listing identifierB08J1JBMSR
Retailer listing titleZahler Junior D3 Vitamins 1000 IU - Chewable Vitamin D3 for Kids to Su…
show full title Zahler Junior D3 Vitamins 1000 IU - Chewable Vitamin D3 for Kids to Support Bone, Teeth & Immune Health - Kosher Orange Flavor - 250 Count
USPTO brand ownerAdvanced Nutrition by Zahler · CORPORATION · NEW YORK, USA
Owner filed address50 Lawrence Avenue, Brooklyn, NEW YORK 11230, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 Tablet
Servings per container250
Pack statement250 CHEWABLE TABLETS
Badges printed on packHighest Manufacturing Standards, KOSHER PAREVE, U, GMP Certified Facility, MADE IN THE USA

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Vitamin D3 (as Cholecalciferol) (1000 IU)25 mcg 125%High
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“Supports Healthy Bones & Immune System*” · “Great-Tasting Natural Orange Flavor” · “DELICIOUS” · “CHEWABLE” · “TABLETS” · “Easy to take on a daily basis.” · “Contains less sugar than gummy vitamins” · “Delicious Orange Flavor”

Read by a vision model from 6 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$25.97 checked Jul 26, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science

No knowledge-base entry yet for this formula's active ingredients — entries are added as the KB grows. Absence of a science card is a coverage gap, not a judgment.

Ingredient science — NIH references

Vitamin DNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (26,500) · UL 100 mcg (adults; 100 mcg = 4,000 IU)

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Record 848998082222 · built July 26, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai