Specific fact confirmed
UPC independently corroborated
Open Food Facts resolves 850003843063 to "Bye Bye Bloat" (Love Wellness) — consistent with this listing.
Start with the question · Love Wellness
Love Wellness Bye Bye Bloat
Bye-Bye Blot Blend publishes one combined total, not its individual ingredient doses.
Rebuilt from public sources on July 22, 2026 · evidence availability is not a safety or effectiveness verdict.
What this means for you · Start with the question
Why this deserves a closer look
The panel lists “Bye-Bye Blot Blend” as a combined amount. A blend total can’t tell you whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research.
Panel, decoded
What the label discloses
1declared rows
0separately quantified
1combined blend totals
The listing-image panel publishes 0 separately quantified rows and 1 combined blend total. Ingredients inside a blend do not have separate amounts.
| Panel row | Amount | %DV | What to notice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bye-Bye Blot Blend | 860 mg | — |
FDA rules (21 CFR 101.36) require the amount of each dietary ingredient per serving unless hidden in a declared “proprietary blend” (legal, but a transparency yellow flag). A label stating no amount at all is non-compliant — a checkable red flag. This panel states amounts; the open question is whether those declared amounts are independently verified and how they compare with relevant research.
vision:google/gemini-flash-1.5 Amounts are shown as declared panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.
Public ownership records
The brand has 4 exact supplement-class records
These are the USPTO records behind the brand name. We show them all rather than choosing one by similarity.
🇺🇸Ogilvie Brands, Inc.
NEW YORK, USA; DELAWARE, USA · Registration 6031056
NEW YORK, USA) DBA Love Wellness; Suite 8500, 1 World Trade Center, New York, NEW YORK 10007, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 005: Personal lubricants.
🇺🇸Ogilvie Brands, Inc. (DBA Love Wellness)
Delaware, USA · Registration application / registration number not stated
1 World Trade Center, Suite 8500, New York, New York 10007, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 035: Retail and online retail store services featuring personal care products, skin care preparations, intimate care products, vitamin supplements, dietary supplements and nutritional supplements.; IC 005: Vitamin supplements; dietary supplements; nutritional supplements.
🇺🇸Ogilvie Brands, Inc.
DELAWARE, USA · Registration application / registration number not stated
DELAWARE, USA) DBA Love Wellness; 1 World Trade Center, Suite 8500, New York, NEW YORK 10007, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 003: Skin moisturizer masks; Skin hydrating masks; Skin masks; Electrolyte skin masks; Body masks; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, skin masks.; IC 005: Vaginal and vulva preparations for the treatment of vaginal and perineal tearing; vaginal moisturizers; vulva moisturizers; vaginal washes for medical purposes; vaginal antifungals.; IC 010: Massage apparatus; Facial rollers in the nature of massage apparatus.
🇺🇸Ogilvie Brands, Inc.
DELAWARE, USA · Registration 6323828
DELAWARE, USA) DBA Love Wellness; Suite 8500, 1 World Trade Center, New York, NEW YORK 10007, UNITED STATES
Goods covered by this record
IC 035: On-line retail store services featuring personal care products, intimate personal care products, skin care products, vitamin supplements, dietary supplements and nutritional supplements.
This answers who owns registrations for the brand wordmark. It does not by itself prove which entity made, imported, or sold this specific product.
Review history
–/ 5
not shownvisible ratings
Review counts rose gradually. Written-review counts rose from 1,130 to 1,165 across the observed period. That describes count movement, not review authenticity or product quality. A variation family may share some public counts.
Keepa exact-listing history · counts do not prove authenticity · variation family may share counts
Relevant research · quick links
Read the ingredient evidence directly
These links provide the public research context used alongside the captured panel. They do not establish safety, effectiveness, or product quality.
What would settle the biggest open question?
Which exact USPTO registrant is tied to this product's brand use? Evidence that would settle it: exact-wordmark ownership record.
Open the full evidence trailSources, edge cases, and every unresolved check
Confirmed evidence
What checked out01
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Barcode confirmed in an outside database
Open Food Facts resolves 850003843063 to "Bye Bye Bloat" (Love Wellness) — consistent with this listing.
Documented concerns
What needs caution01
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing05
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
The listing doesn't publish enough to check the math
The retained listing evidence does not establish net weight, per-serving dose, so the dose claim cannot yet be checked against serving arithmetic. This is a neutral evidence gap, not a pass or strike.
Multiple USPTO brand-owner records are shown
USPTO returned multiple live supplement-class records for the exact brand wordmark: Ogilvie Brands, Inc., Ogilvie Brands, Inc. (DBA Love Wellness). These records answer who owns registrations for the brand; the separate product-to-owner or manufacturer link remains open.
No label filed with NIH's public catalog
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
This item belongs to a catalog variation family
The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.
180-day review-count history is on file
Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 1,130 on 2026-02-13 to 1,165 on 2026-07-20 (net +35). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?
A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.
2
Which specific study supports this claim — and was it run on this exact formula?
Ask for the citation, how many people took part, the dose used, and whether the study tested this product or just one ingredient in it. Ingredient research is not product evidence.
3
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
4
Were the endorsing professionals compensated, and what exactly did they review?
An endorsement can be genuine and still not mean the product was tested. Ask whether they reviewed the formula, the manufacturing, or only the marketing.
5
What is the amount of each ingredient inside the proprietary blend?
A blend total tells you nothing about whether any single ingredient reaches a dose used in research. Brands may decline — that answer is informative too.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 850003843063.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
Record built July 22, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.