lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 850006249718 · back to the summary

Further Food Vanilla Collagen Peptides Powder

3 concrete dimensions confirmed · 2 still open · built August 02, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00850006249718 · checked 2026-08-01

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The named ingredient is not separately quantified

MARKETING20 g — per-serving claim
PANELPanel read — named ingredient amount not separately listed
named amount open

The panel was read, but it does not give a separate amount for collagen. The listing claim cannot be compared to a named panel row.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories80
Total Fat0 g
Saturated Fat0 g
Trans Fat0 g
Cholesterol0 mg
Sodium65 mg
Total Carbohydrate<1 g
Dietary Fiber0 g
Total Sugars0 g
Includes Added Sugars0 g
Protein18 g
Vit D0 mcg
Calcium0 mg
Iron0 mg
Potassium0 mg

vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out5

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

The dose claim fits the serving — physically possible

Claimed collagen 20,000.0 mg is 95% of the ≈21,000 mg serving (serving size on the label, keyed to UPC 850006249718) — within physical limits.

Confirmed

Found on the brand's own store

The brand's store lists this exact barcode as “Vanilla Collagen Peptides Powder” (variant: 22 Ounce (30 SERVINGS)) — identity confirmed across retailer listings.

Confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists Further Inc. (CORPORATION) in DELAWARE, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Barcode confirmed in an outside database

Open Food Facts resolves 850006249718 to "Collagen Peptides - Vanilla" (Further Food) — consistent with this listing.

Confirmed

The review count moved gradually, not in one burst

Written reviews rose from 5 to 7 between November 19, 2025 and May 29, 2026. No single 30-day window in the dated series shows a rise.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution0

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

No contradictions or product-specific cautions were found at this check depth.

Unresolved public record

What is still missing9

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named

The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.

No data

The headline amount is not tied to a panel row for the same ingredient

The listing presents 20,000 mg for collagen, but vision:claude-cli:subscription does not contain a same-name quantified row. The saved image read may be incomplete, so this is a specific question to resolve rather than a contradiction.

No data

Photo-read pack math is internally consistent

30 servings × 21 g = 630 g, matching the printed net weight 630 g (Net Wt. 22.22oz (630g)). This checks agreement within the photo read; it is not an independent contents test.

No data

Cost to reach a studied dose

At 1.0 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (3000–10000 mg), this product runs roughly $50 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how prebiotic fiber have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context), PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

This item belongs to a catalog variation family

The paid catalog links this exact item to a parent listing. Review counts on public product pages may be shared across sizes, flavors, or other variants, so the count history is listing context — not evidence that reviewers received or tested this exact variant.

No data

180-day review-count history is on file

Exact-listing history records written-review counts from 4 on 2025-08-19 to 7 on 2026-05-29 (net +3). Count movements can reflect sales, listing variants, collection resets, or moderation; this history does not establish whether reviews are authentic.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 850006249718.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…3rd Party Tested”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. The exact brand page names no testing issuer and links no product-bound report. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Benefit claim
“…Beauty from Within – Hydrolyzed Type 1 & 3 collagen supports firm, radiant skin, strong nails, and shiny hair.…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Published research exists for ingredients in this formula. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
prebiotic fiber (inulin-type)Studies typically use 3 g–10 g. This product’s amount could not be read from public sources, so no comparison is possible.

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Label math — claimed dose vs. serving mass
Why is this shown?
Simple physics: the claimed dose has to weigh less than the whole serving. We compare the milligrams promised on the label to the weight of one serving, from the label itself. If the claim fits — even at a small percentage, which is normal, since servings include binders and flavoring — the label is at least physically possible. Only a lab test can confirm what’s actually inside.
claimed collagen 20000 mg95% of serving mass — tiny doses are normal for potent activesserving ≈ 21,000 mg

The claimed collagen dose of 20000 mg fits within the ≈21,000 mg serving — physically possible. Only a lab test can confirm what’s actually inside.

A low percentage isn’t a red flag — most servings are mostly carrier, binder, and flavoring.

Show the arithmetic
collagen: 20000 mg claimed ÷ 21,000 mg serving mass = 95%. Serving mass source: listing-derived. Redo it yourself — that’s the point.

Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals

✓ Per-serving dose established✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID850006249718 — via source listing UPC
BrandFurther Food
Source listing identifierB0CY5JJZBL
Retailer listing titleFurther Food Vanilla Collagen Peptides Powder, 100% Grass-Fed, 22.22 O…
show full title Further Food Vanilla Collagen Peptides Powder, 100% Grass-Fed, 22.22 Oz
USPTO brand ownerFurther Inc. · CORPORATION · DELAWARE, USA
Owner filed addressSuite 6H, PMB 1447, 407 Lincoln Road, Miami Beach, Florida 33139, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving size1 Scoop (21 grams)
Servings per container30
Net weightNet Wt. 22.22oz (630g)

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories80 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Fat0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Saturated Fat0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Trans Fat0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Cholesterol0 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium65 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrate<1 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Dietary Fiber0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total Sugars0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Includes Added Sugars0 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Protein18 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Vit D0 mcgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Calcium0 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Iron0 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Potassium0 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“Grass-fed” · “20g Collagen per serving” · “VANILLA” · “FLAVORED WITH OTHER NATURAL FLAVORS” · “Skin, hair, nails” · “Gut & joint support” · “4 powerful ingredients, that's it!” · “Premium, Clean Collagen”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$49.99 checked Aug 02, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending
Brand store (furtherfood.com) ↗$79.00 variant: 22 Ounce (30 SERVINGS) — matching UPC/GTIN

Brand store furtherfood.com: 47 supplement products (+1 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

CalciumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (48,938) · UL 2500 mg (adults 19-50 (2,000 mg for 51+))

IronNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (28,479) · UL 45 mg (adults, from all sources)

PotassiumNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (16,128) · no UL; supplements capped at 99 mg OTC

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

prebiotic fiber (inulin-type)NIH ODS — Fiber overview (MVMS context) · PubMed search: inulin prebiotic randomized trial · WebMD search: inulin · ClinicalTrials.gov — 22 registered studies

Use pattern in research: daily use; effects build over weeks as gut flora shift.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 850006249718 · built August 02, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai