The dose claim fits the serving — physically possible
Claimed 1,000.0 mg is 17% of the ≈6,000 mg serving (serving size on the label, keyed to UPC 850009273017) — within physical limits.
LookCloser record · 850009273017 · methodology v0.1
LMNT Zero Sugar Electrolytes - Raspberry Salt | Drink Mix | 30-Count
Result
MODERATE public verifiability
Caution — unverified claims UPC resolves to a different product. Evidence availability only; this does not establish safety or effectiveness.
3 of 6 public trust signals found · 1 product-specific concern · $2.11 per serving
The short read
The Supplement Facts panel clearly lists 1000mg of Sodium per serving. While this is a documented fact, there's a discrepancy between this and a different claim of 1g (which is also 1000mg) that's not detailed in the provided information. The product also contains 200mg of Potassium per serving, and the total amount of ingredients on the label adds up correctly. You can verify the number of servings by counting the individual packets in your package.
Why this result?
We ran this product through public-record checks — label math, barcode registries, FDA recall lists, published lab tests. This banner sums up what those checks could and couldn’t confirm. Green means nothing public contradicted the label — not proof it works or is safe. Gray means the data to check simply isn’t public: a gap, not a verdict. We show the evidence; the conclusion is yours.
Confirmed evidence
What checked out05
These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.
Confirmed
Listing claim matches the label panel
The listing claims 200 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Potassium at 200 mg per serving. The two independent statements agree.
Taken the way the research studied it
Nothing in this listing contradicts how these ingredients were studied (magnesium). For example, magnesium: daily oral use; chelated forms (glycinate) are studied for absorption — note labels may state compound mass rather than elemental magnesium, which differs ~7-fold. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.
Every ingredient amount is disclosed
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Pack math confirmed from the label
30 servings × 6 g = 180 g, matching the printed net weight 180 g (NET WT 6.3oz (180g)). Any different figure in the marketplace’s shipping-weight field describes packaging, not the product.
Documented concerns
What needs caution01
These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.
UPC resolves to a different product
Open Food Facts lists 850009273017 as "ELECTROLYTE DRINK MIX" (LMNT) — which does not match this listing. Recorded as a discrepancy to explain, not proof of fraud.
Unresolved public record
What is still missing04
We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.
Reviews not analysed yet
Marketplace rating 4.6★ across 6,470 ratings. Authenticity not analysed: burst, purge and stockout patterns need price/review history.
Magnesium amount, in daily-intake context
label states 60 mg/serving — about 14% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 310–420 mg elemental; NIH sets 350 mg/day as the supplemental upper level for elemental magnesium). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate labels (glycinate, citrate) often state compound mass, which reads ~5–7× higher than elemental magnesium — the Supplement Facts panel settles which is meant. Sources: NIH ODS — Magnesium fact sheet, PubMed search: magnesium glycinate supplementation.
Cost to reach a studied dose
At 1.0 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (200–420 mg), this product runs roughly $63 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.
No label filed with NIH's public catalog
The NIH Dietary Supplement Label Database has no matching label yet. Ingestion lags the market — recorded as a gap, not a strike.
What to ask and check
What would settle the open questions
Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.
Ask the brand or seller
1
Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?
Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.
2
Where are the ingredients sourced, and where is the product manufactured?
“Made in USA” can describe only the final bottling step. Ask which country the actives came from and whether the facility is audited.
Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.
Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed
1
Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.
Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.
2
Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 850009273017.
A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.
3
Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.
A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.
These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.
The full report is free no signup · no paywall
Every check, claim, label read, dose comparison, registry search, source, and date. Free to read, download, and share.
Want to know if this changes?
Supplements are repeat purchases. Formulas get reformulated, lots get recalled, brands finally publish the lab report they were asked for. We can watch this record and email you only if something changes.
Your address is used for this one purpose. No newsletter, no marketing, no third parties, no tracking pixels — and every email carries a one-click unsubscribe that needs no login. We store the address, the record, and the date. Nothing else.
Record built July 21, 2026. Sources: source listing (live fetch) · brand's own storefront · published independent assays (NOW Foods 2024, SuppCo 2025; brand-level) · PubMed · openFDA · Open Food Facts · NIH DSLD · LookCloser ingredient KB. Evidence-tiered statements of documented fact; conclusions belong to the reader. Beta: this report isn’t yet independently archived — treat it as a well-sourced starting point, not a certificate. Evidence-based corrections welcome.