Checked against public sources on July 26, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
The observed listing says it is tested, but names no lab or certifier. A testing badge without an issuer or report is a marketing claim, not evidence. Ask for the lab name and lot-specific report.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. No exact brand product page was available for a document check. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
We looked and found no public proof. That does not count against the product.
PREMIUM INGREDIENTS
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
A count that moves steadily is ordinary. A sudden burst is what deserves a closer look.
The dated series runs from 555 written reviews on February 17, 2026 to 776 on July 18, 2026. Up to 436 written reviews were added within a single ~30-day window — 56% of the total. Sudden bursts are the usual fingerprint of incentivized or bought reviews; a steady climb is not.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingEvery ingredient shows its real amount — nothing is hidden in a proprietary blend.
The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThese are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Filed address
6800 Long Leaf Drive, Parkland, Florida 33076, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
We could not match an amount on this product to a studied range for the same ingredient, so these links are ingredient background rather than a measurement of this product.
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 26, 2026
View on Amazon ↗matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 26, 2026
View on Target ↗matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 26, 2026
View on iHerb ↗We only show a price when the seller publishes the same barcode as the bottle. We haven’t found that match here.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 3 sellers. Amazon was lowest at $16.95; iHerb was highest at $19.99 — a $3.04 range at check time.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
The full report shows every source, the exact unresolved question, and the documentation that would settle it.
Record built July 26, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.