Published research exists for ingredients in this formula — see Related research below. Whether this product’s doses match those studies could not be confirmed.

Maryruth'S Organic Ashwagandha Root Liquid Drops
Checked against public sources on July 25, 2026 · LookCloser does not sell or recommend supplements.
Does the marketing hold up?
FDA recall appears in this brand's history An exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.
“Couldn’t verify” means we looked and found no public proof — not a mark against the product. Most supplement claims cannot be independently verified by anyone, so grey is the normal state of this industry.
The checks, one by one
The public sources did not settle the marketing promises on this label.
◐Partly confirmed2
“GMP-certified” describes factory processes, not what is in the bottle. The claim does not name a certifier or public register that a shopper can check.
Ingredient research can support context, but it is not a trial of this exact product.
What is worth knowing.
Headlines first. Open evidence only when you want the source trail.
FDA recall appears in this brand's history
An exact-product recall is a direct signal. A different product from the same firm is company context, not a strike against this item.
Evidence and sources
Brand-level context only, not a finding about this product. MARY RUTH ORGANICS recalled a different or not-exactly-bound product on 2021-10-28: “Internal testing found the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the product.” (status: Terminated). The recalled product was: “MaryRut…
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingThe barcode identity checks out · 850018471657.
The barcode matches, so we are checking the right product rather than a look-alike.
Evidence and sources
The brand's store lists this exact barcode as “Organic Ashwagandha Root Liquid Drops” (variant: Default Title) — identity confirmed across retailer listings.
Locked evidence record →Open the full source-linked findingWhat remains open 4
- Panel amounts still need a clearer source image.
- No matched to this exact product public label filing is saved in this record.
- Barcode checksum is valid; no independent product record was found.
- No dated review-history series is on file yet.
These are evidence gaps, not strikes against the product.
Filed address
9220 Sunset Blvd., Suite 320, West Hollywood, California 90069, UNITED STATES
USPTO identifies the public owner or applicant behind this brand wordmark. This does not by itself identify the product manufacturer or prove where the product was made. Open USPTO source ↗
Dose and research context
The label amount is shown beside the ranges used in the linked ingredient studies.
Price check for this exact product
Amazon
Exact UPC/GTIN match$0.24 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 25, 2026
View on Amazon ↗Target
Exact UPC/GTIN match$0.30 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 25, 2026
View on Target ↗iHerb
Exact UPC/GTIN match$0.33 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 25, 2026
View on iHerb ↗Brand website
Exact UPC/GTIN match$0.37 per labeled serving
matching UPC/GTIN · checked Jul 25, 2026
View on Brand website ↗Walmart
Not confirmedSearch results remain not linked to this exact product until this retailer publishes the matching UPC/GTIN.
Search Walmart ↗Same UPC/GTIN observed across 4 sellers. Amazon was lowest at $14.39; Brand website was highest at $21.95 — a $7.56 range at check time.
Reference prices only · no affiliate links · every compared seller must publish the matching UPC/GTIN.
Want the complete evidence trail?
The summary stops at product-specific facts. The full report preserves every source, calculation, limitation, and unresolved check for review or sharing.
Record built July 25, 2026. Sources: source listing observed at check time · USPTO Trademark Search · Keepa exact-listing history · NIH / published research · certification and regulator records where available. LookCloser publishes evidence and gaps; it does not advise for or against any supplement. Evidence-based corrections welcome.