lookcloser.ai full report

Full record · 850023062109 · back to the summary

Lifeable Zinc Gummies for Women and Men, Maximum Strength 50 mg

4 concrete dimensions confirmed · 1 still open · built August 17, 2026

Exact product image from the source listing
Exact product checkedGTIN 00850023062109 · checked 2026-08-17

Free to read, download and share — no signup, no paywall, no ads.

Download / print this report (free) ← Simple view
How to read this report

What this is. We compare what a listing claims against what public records show — label arithmetic, barcode registries, NIH’s label catalog, FDA enforcement data, certification registries, and published research. Every statement below traces to one of those.

What the states mean. Confirmed = an outside source agrees. Contradicted = an outside source disagrees. Caution = something needs explaining. No data = we looked and found nothing — a gap, not a strike.

What it is not. A clean record is not an endorsement and never proof a product works. A thin record is not an accusation. We publish evidence and gaps; the conclusion is yours. Nothing here is medical advice.

Something wrong? Every figure is meant to be checkable — sources are named and linked. Send a correction and we’ll fix the record.

Panel, decoded

The 50 mg zinc (as zinc citrate) claim matches the panel

MARKETING50 mg — per-serving claim
PANELZinc (as Zinc Citrate) 50 mg — same amountIncludes 3 g Added sugars 3 g
matches panel

We did the comparison: the listing claims 50 mg of zinc (as zinc citrate), and the listing-image panel shows 50 mg zinc (as zinc citrate) serving size: 2 gummies. Those amounts agree. This is internal consistency, not independent lab testing.

Panel rowAmount%DVWhat to notice
Calories20
Total Carbohydrates5 g
Total Sugars3 g
Includes 3 g Added sugars3 g
Zinc (as Zinc Citrate)50 mg
Sodium5 mg
Mass check · assumptions shown
8 g listed contents = 3 g major actives + 5 g carbohydrate
Assume 4 pectin gummies × 2.5–3.5 g each = 10–14 g serving. That leaves roughly 0–2 g for water, pectin, sweetener, acid, and flavor. Serving weight is not printed, so this is a warning, not a closed impossibility.

vision:claude-cli:subscription Amounts are shown as listed panel data, not independently lab-tested contents.

Every check we ran

Confirmed evidence

What checked out3

These checks found support in the public record. They confirm specific facts, not the product as a whole.

Every ingredient amount is disclosed

The panel gives a per-ingredient amount rather than hiding quantities inside a proprietary blend, so each one can be compared to published research.

Confirmed

Exact trademark owner identified

USPTO lists VitaDreams (CORPORATION) in NEW YORK, USA for the exact brand wordmark. This identifies the USPTO mark owner or applicant; it does not by itself prove who manufactures or sells this product.

Confirmed

Barcode confirmed in an outside database

UPCitemdb resolves 850023062109 to "Lifeable Zinc - 50mg Gummies - 90 Gummies" (Lifeable) — consistent with this listing.

Confirmed

Documented concerns

What needs caution1

These are documented contradictions or claims that need more evidence. They are separate from missing data.

!

The label says 8 g of zinc in 4 gummies — but not what those 4 g

A serving is 4 gummies, and the panel lists 8,000 mg — 8 g — of zinc in that serving. What the panel doesn’t give is the one number needed to check it: what a serving weighs. Gummies of this type usually run somewhere around 2.5 to 3.5 grams each, which would put 4 of them near 10 to 14 grams. If that holds here, zinc would be a high share of the serving’s weight, and that is why we stopped on this number. But we did not weigh these gummies. The 2.5–3.5 gram figure is a general estimate for the format, not a measurement of this product. One published number would settle it: the weight of one gummy, or of a 4-gummy serving. Until then we can’t confirm the 8 g and we can’t dispute it. Nothing here says the product is short — only that the label doesn’t let anyone check. Checked August 17, 2026.

Caution

Unresolved public record

What is still missing8

We looked for these signals but could not settle them from public sources. A gap is not a strike.

Review-count history: not available

Marketplace rating not shown★ — rating count unavailable. No exact-listing count history was available, so no review-pattern claim is made.

No data

“Lab tested” claimed, but no lab or report named

The observed listing claims third-party testing without naming a lab or certifier. No product-bound report is saved, so the claim cannot be verified as stated. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record.

No data

Listing claim matches the label panel

The listing claims 50 mg; the photo-read Supplement Facts panel shows Zinc (as Zinc Citrate) at 50 mg per serving — the listing text and its photo-read panel agree; this is internal consistency, not independent testing.

No data

Cost to reach a studied dose

At 1.0 serving(s) a day to reach the low end of the studied range (8–40 mg), this product runs roughly $11 per month. A price observation, not a recommendation.

No data

Research context is available for the listed ingredients

Published sources describe how zinc have been studied. This is ingredient context only; the record does not establish that this product delivers the studied dose or outcome. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.

No data

Zinc amount, in daily-intake context

label states 50 mg/serving — about 125% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 8–11 mg; NIH sets 40 mg/day as the tolerable upper limit for adults). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate and gluconate labels may state compound mass rather than elemental zinc. Sources: NIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet, PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial.

No data

Public label filing not saved

We have not found a public label filing for this exact product. That is a gap in our records, not evidence that no filing exists.

No data

No recall found — which is not the same as being tested

This means only that no enforcement record matched the brand name — it does not mean the product was tested, reviewed, or cleared by FDA. New and untested products also have no recall records.

No data

What to ask and check

What would settle the open questions

Why is this shown?
Everything we couldn’t verify is something a person can still ask about. Rather than leave gaps sitting as dead ends, we turn each one into a specific question — the exact document, citation, or number that would settle it — plus the things you can confirm yourself with the bottle in your hand.

Ask the brand or seller

1

Can you send the certificate of analysis (COA) for the lot number on my bottle?

A real COA names the testing laboratory, the test date, the lot it covers, and what was measured. “Third-party tested” with no document behind it is a marketing sentence.

2

Is this label filed with NIH’s Dietary Supplement Label Database (DSLD)?

Filing is voluntary, so absence proves nothing — but a filed label puts the full ingredient table on public record where anyone can read it.

Most brands and sellers publish a contact route. A clear answer adds evidence to the record; no answer leaves the question open.

Check for yourself — no one’s permission needed

1

Compare the panel on the bottle in your hand to the one shown in this record.

Ours was read from listing photos and can contain reading errors. The physical label is the source of truth — if they disagree, tell us and we’ll correct the record.

2

Scan the barcode on the package and confirm it reads 850023062109.

A mismatch between the barcode on the box and the one on the listing is worth pausing over — it can indicate a different variant, a repack, or a counterfeit.

3

Check the lot number and expiry on the bottle against any COA you’re given.

A certificate that doesn’t name your lot doesn’t describe what you’re holding.

These are the open questions on this specific record — not a warning about the product, and not a suggestion to buy or avoid it. Getting them answered is how you decide for yourself.

What the listing promises — claim by claim

Why is this shown?
A listing’s promises are the reason people buy. Each one gets its own row: what was promised, what evidence would settle it, and what we could actually find. We never call a claim false — only whether proof proportionate to it exists on the public record.
ClaimStatusWhat we found
Quality-testing claim
“…Certified kosher and halal, non-GMO, gluten free, dairy free, nut free (nut free facility), and third party lab tested.…”
Claimed, not verifiable
We looked for: the observed listing, saved brand product page, any linked COA or test report; NSF, IFOS, USP, Informed-Sport were not queried
No named laboratory or lot-specific certificate was found for this exact product. A related brand page names no testing issuer and links no product-bound report; its UPC is not published. NSF, IFOS, USP, and Informed-Sport were not checked in this record. This is a public-evidence limit, not a finding that testing did not occur.
Benefit claim
“…Supports Immune Health: zinc is an essential mineral your immune system relies on - it also supports wound healing, your sense of taste and smell, and healthy skin.…”
Partly supported
We looked for: whether the ingredient doses on the label match the doses used in published research
Ingredient evidence exists; on dose: label states 50 mg/serving — about 125% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 8–11 mg; NIH sets 40 mg/day as the tolerable upper limit for adults). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate and gluconate labels may state compound mass rather than elemental zinc.

“No evidence located” does not mean a claim is false — it means the seller has not put evidence proportionate to the claim on the public record, and we could not find any. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

This label vs. the doses studied

Why is this shown?
An ingredient can be well-studied at one amount and barely studied at the amount in your bottle. This lines the label up against the doses researchers actually used. It answers ‘are these the same numbers?’ — never ‘should you take this?’
IngredientWhere this label sitsReading
Zinc (as Zinc Citrate)
shaded = doses used in studies (8 mg–40 mg) · bar = this label
50 mg — above the studied range

Matching a studied dose does not mean the product works, and missing it does not mean it fails — it shows whether the label and the research are talking about the same amounts. Not a recommendation to take any amount.

Documented cautions

Statements from published sources about these ingredients — not advice about this product, and not a complete safety review. Anyone taking medication should talk to a pharmacist or clinician.

Verifiability profile — 4 of 6 public signals

✓ Per-serving dose established✓ UPC / GTIN published✓ Supplement Facts visible in photos✓ Brand's own store found· Found in NIH's label catalog (DSLD) — not published· Third-party lab named or registry-certified — not published

What this listing gives the public to check. Publishing these signals doesn't prove quality — but withholding them means claims can only be taken on faith.

Identity

UPC (barcode) — also our record ID850023062109 — via source listing UPC
BrandLifeable
Source listing identifierB08L48GBVQ
Retailer listing titleLifeable Zinc Gummies for Women and Men, Maximum Strength 50 mg, 90 Ct…
show full title Lifeable Zinc Gummies for Women and Men, Maximum Strength 50 mg, 90 Ct
USPTO brand ownerVitaDreams · CORPORATION · NEW YORK, USA
Owner filed address130 Lee Ave #315, Brooklyn, NEW YORK 11211, UNITED STATES

From the label (photo-read)

Serving sizeServing Size: 2 Gummies
Servings per container45
Pack statement90 COUNT
Badges printed on packVegan, Gluten Free, Nut Free, NON GMO, NATURAL FLAVOR, GELATIN FREE and VEGETARIAN, GLUTEN FREE, PEANUT & TREE NUTS FREE

Supplement Facts panel (photo-read):

IngredientAmount per servingReading confidence
Calories20 High
clearly legible in the photo
Total Carbohydrates5 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Total Sugars3 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Includes 3 g Added sugars3 gHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Zinc (as Zinc Citrate)50 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo
Sodium5 mgHigh
clearly legible in the photo

Claims printed on the packaging:

“MAXIMUM STRENGTH” · “ZINC 50 mg per serving” · “DIETARY SUPPLEMENT” · “IMMUNITY*” · “BERRY FLAVOR” · “50mg ZINC” · “2 GUMMIES PER SERVING” · “45 SERVINGS PER BOTTLE”

Read by a vision model from 8 listing photos — verbatim extraction; OCR errors possible. Spot a mistake? It will be corrected on review.

Where it sells

SellerPrice
Retailer listing ↗$16.49 checked Aug 17, 2026 — varies by variant/session; price history pending

Brand store lifeable.com: 92 supplement products (+4 merch items) — for comparison, single-focus brands typically carry 5–30 products; very broad catalogs are common among companies that rebrand ready-made formulas — a pattern note, not a verdict.

Reference links for identification only — LookCloser has no affiliate relationships and earns nothing from any link on this page.

Ingredient science — NIH references

ZincNIH ODS · MedlinePlus · PubMed (19,708) · UL 40 mg (adults, from all sources)

Reference data from the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, IOM Dietary Reference Intakes, and PubMed. A Tolerable Upper Intake Level is a documented reference figure, not a safety verdict — both the listed amount and the reference are shown for your own judgment. LookCloser gives no medical advice.

Related research & consistency

zincNIH ODS — Zinc fact sheet · PubMed search: zinc supplementation trial · ClinicalTrials.gov — 1,598 registered studies

Dosage: label states 50 mg/serving — about 125% of the adult daily reference (adult RDA 8–11 mg; NIH sets 40 mg/day as the tolerable upper limit for adults). A single serving isn’t meant to supply a full day, so this is context, not a shortfall. Caveat: chelate and gluconate labels may state compound mass rather than elemental zinc.

Use pattern in research: daily oral use; sustained high intakes can interfere with copper absorption — a documented interaction, not advice.

These notes state where label numbers and marketing framing sit relative to published research — documentation for your own judgment, not medical advice. LookCloser does not advise for or against taking any supplement.

Record 850023062109 · built August 17, 2026 · lookcloser.ai · corrections@lookcloser.ai